DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND RULING
Defendant’s unopposed request for clarification and ruling states that the undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for plaintiff who does not object to the relief requested in the motion.
DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
Defendant’s unopposed motion for extension of time to provide a reply in support of motion for clarification.
Defendant’s trial brief
Defendant’s trial brief addresses the direction to the parties on the which will be provided to the jury including whether Soriano is now the law of the case and whether the defendant can challenge the reasonableness of the arbitration award.
DEFENDANT’S THIRD MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING RIGHTS VERSUS DUTIES
Defendant’s third motion in limine regarding rights versus duties states that pursuant to CRCP 121, counsel certifies conferral with counsel for plaintiff who object to the relief requested.
DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME
Defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding the testimony of expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s second motion regarding PEV or reserve information.
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO INCLUDE A PRAYER FOR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES
Defendant’s response to plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint to include a prayer for exemplary damages.
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE RE: DEFENDANT’S NAME INSURANCE EXCHANGE’S “OPPORTUNITY TO SETTLE”
Defendant’s response and objections to plaintiff’s motion regarding defendant’s “opportunity to settle”.
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S ORDER RE: DEPOSITION
Defendant’s requests the court to reconsider objections which were upheld by Division 3 in their review of the deposition of expert.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant’s reply to plaintiff’s response to the first motion regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THIRD MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING RIGHTS VERSUS DUTIES
Defendant’s reply in support of third motion regarding rights versus duties owed by defendant.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER ON FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant submits a reply in support of its motion for clarification of the order on defendant’s first motion regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FOURTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING ATTORNEY’S NAME
Defendant’s reply in support motion regarding conduct, advice, actions or inaction of the attorney.