Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Brief arguing that certain gang based and domestic sexual violence based claims still qualify as a particular social group membership for purposes of asylum post Matter of A-B-. Also argues that certain conclusions reached in Matter of A-B- are flawed and contradict current caselaw.
Motion to Permit Telephonic Appearance of Counsel – Immigration
Motion to the Board of Immigration Appeals to reconsider the USCIS revocation of a marriage based Form I-130 Petition for Alien Relative. Legal Argument: Impermissible revocation, proper legal standard for good faith marriage, petitioner’s burden to show bona fide marriage, proper evidentiary standard.
A employment contract for a bilingual receptionist or secretary. The contract include employer providing phone for remote receptionist to answer. Termination and return of property are also included in the terms of the contract. State can easily be changed to use in any state or jurisdiction
Brief to the Board of Immigration Appeals appealing the Immigration Court’s denial of bond. Respondent argued that the Immigration Judge failed to weigh all positive and negative factors in determining bond. Additionally new circumstances arose following the hearing in which the Respondent received substandard medical care in detention, which justified remand to the court to reconsider its bond ruling.
Brief to Board of Immigration Appeals arguing eligibility for VAWA cancellation based upon extreme cruelty by USC spouse due to his alcoholism.
An Immigration Court brief that argues that certain crimes do not involve moral turpitude including:1) Whether Mr. X’s conviction for harassment does not constitute a crime involving moral turpitude for immigration inadmissibility purposes 2) If the Court finds that Mr. X’s conviction for harassment is a crime involving moral turpitude, it qualifies under the petty offense exception.
Immigration Defendant seeking to exclude statements made to ICE and other government agents in prior contacts with ICE and other law enforcement regarding his immigration status (Defendant exercised the 5th in this case). US District Court for the District of Arizona.