NIT Motion to Suppress Evidence, Evidentiary Hearing in a Pornography Case
NIT Motion to Suppress Evidence, Evidentiary Hearing in a Child Pornography Case
This product is legally relevant in all U.S. 50 states and territories. This product comes in both .pdf and .docx (Microsoft Word) formats for your convenience.
Have any questions regarding this product? Please feel free to email: support@attorneydocs.com
NIT Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Pornography Case
NIT Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss – Child Pornography Case
A document that cites (refers to) legal authorities such as statutes and court cases, and explains how those authorities support the position advocated by the party who wrote the memorandum. Filed motion to suppress the evidence seized during the search of the computer, including the information revealed by the use of the NIT.
Motion and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Exclude Evidence – Pornography Laws
Motion for an order to exclude all evidence and its fruits derived from the “network investigative techniques” code that the Government used to search the Defendant’s personal computer.
Motion in Support of Necessity of Taint Hearing, Response to State’s Objection – SVU Case
Motion in support of the previously filed “motion for a pretrial taint hearing” to determine whether the statements and testimony of the child sex abuse witness must be excluded if improper questioning has irremediably compromised the reliability and trustworthiness of that testimonial evidence.
Motion Defendant’s Supplemental Demand for Discovery and Inspection – SVU Case
Motion to provide the defense an opportunity to inspect and copy all physical evidence which the plaintiff intends to introduce into evidence.
Memo In Support Of Motion To Compel Discovery And DNA Sample – Sex Trafficking SVU
Suppl Memo In Support Of Motion To Compel Discovery And DNA Sample – Sex Trafficking
This product is legally relevant in all U.S. 50 states and territories. This product comes in both .pdf and .docx (Microsoft Word) formats for your convenience.
Have any questions regarding this product? Please feel free to email: support@attorneydocs.com
Second Suppl Memo in Support Of Motion for Discovery And DNA Sample – Sex Trafficking
Second Suppl Memo in Support Of Motion for Discovery And DNA Sample – Sex Trafficking
This product is legally relevant in all U.S. 50 states and territories. This product comes in both .pdf and .docx (Microsoft Word) formats for your convenience.
Have any questions regarding this product? Please feel free to email: support@attorneydocs.com
Reply To State’s Response To Notice Of Intent To Cross And Admit Evidence Re Prior False Allegations in a Sex Case
Reply To State’s Response To Notice Of Intent To Cross And Admit Evidence Re Prior False Allegations in a Sex Case
This product is legally relevant in all U.S. 50 states and territories. This product comes in both .pdf and .docx (Microsoft Word) formats for your convenience.
Have any questions regarding this product? Please feel free to email: support@attorneydocs.com
Motion to Suppress DNA in a Sex Case
Motions the Court to exclude any DNA related evidence at trial in this matter.
DNA evidence can become contaminated when DNA from another source gets mixed with DNA relevant to the case. For this reason, investigators and laboratory personnel should always wear disposable gloves, use clean instruments, and avoid touching other objects, including their own body, when handling evidence.
Forensic evidence increasingly includes genetic fingerprinting, but researchers worry that juries may put too much stock in the results. Since the advent of DNA testing, it’s solved cold cases, connected crimes committed in different jurisdictions and even freed innocent men from death row.
One of the most reliable forms of evidence in many criminal cases is in our genes, encoded in DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). DNA evidence can be collected from blood, hair, skin cells, and other bodily substances. It can even be used to solve old crimes that occurred prior to the development of DNA-testing technology.
Compared to fingerprinting or eyewitness testimony, which both have inherent flaws and inaccuracies, DNA evidence is a highly effective way to match a suspect to biological samples collected during a criminal investigation.
Motion for Sanction in a Sex Crimes Case
Motion for Sanction in a Sex Crimes Case
Most courts recognize when a motion for sanctions is employed as a litigation tactic and treat such a motion accordingly. Still, some conduct merits potential sanctions against a party and/or its counsel. The most common predicates for a motion for sanctions are discovery disputes and frivolous litigation.
Courts may impose penalties, called sanctions, when improper conduct is employed during litigation. Sanctions are usually fines. A lawyer seeking sanctions must file a motion with the court. A hearing is set during which the lawyer must produce evidence of wrongful conduct.
Motion to Preclude References to the Accuser as the Victim in a Sex Crimes Case
Motion to Preclude References to the Accuser as the Victim in a Sex Crimes Case
It is a request to the court to do something. A motion to preclude is to prevent you from using some piece of evidence at the time of trial.
This product is legally relevant in all U.S. 50 states and territories. This product comes in both .pdf and .docx (Microsoft Word) formats for your convenience.
Have any questions regarding this product? Please feel free to email: support@attorneydocs.com
Motion to Permit Evidence of Alleged Victims Prior History Pursuant
Orders an evidentiary hearing to permit questioning of an alleged victim concerning evidence of their prior history and permitting the admission of the matters into evidence at trial.
Motion to Compel Discovery and DNA Sample – Sex Trafficking
Motions Court to produce discovery and compel a DNA sample.
