Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Defendant’s Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Favorable Evidence
Defendant’s Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Favorable Evidence
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR RELEASE ON BOND
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR RELEASE ON BOND
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35(b
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35(b)
Defendant’s Motion for Release of Pending Pretrial
Defendant’s Motion for Release of Pending Pretrial
Defendant’s Motion for Release on Home Confinement
Defendant’s Motion for Release on Home Confinement
Defendant’s Motion for Release on Recognizance and Reconsideration of Order of Detention
Defendant’s Motion for Release on Recognizance and Reconsideration of Order of Detention
Defendant’s Motion for Severance Pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P.14(a)
Defendant’s Motion for Severance Pursuant to Fed.R. Crim.P.14(a)
Defendant’s Motion for the Production of Evidence from the Government’s DNA Expert
Defendant’s Motion for the Production of Evidence from the Government’s DNA Expert
Defendant’s Motion for Voluntary Surrender
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY SURRENDER
Defendant’s Motion in Limine
Federal criminal motion in limine, where defendant seeks to exclude out of court statements, news reports, GAO office reports and other items. US District Court for the District of Colorado.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine Re: Initial Contact
Defendant in an Immigration case seeking to exclude the reasons for, and facts that, he was in jail when ICE agents made contact with him.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine Re: Statements Within Immigration
Immigration Defendant seeking to exclude statements made to ICE and other government agents in prior contacts with ICE and other law enforcement regarding his immigration status (Defendant exercised the 5th in this case). US District Court for the District of Arizona.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Improper Opinion Testimony
Defendant’s Motion in Limine to exclude specific improper opinion testimony. Filed in the US istrict Court for the Western District of California, the motion, with exhibits, seeks to exclude improperly disclosed (or undisclosed) and otherwise impermissible opinion testimony under Rule 16(G).
Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Preclude Evidence of Uncharged Tax Years
Motion by a criminal defendant in the US District Court for the Western District of California to preclude the inclusion of specific evidence. In this case, to exclude evidence of tax filings for ax years not included in the Government’s charges.