Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Creative Discovery Motions in Sex Cases
This product presents a guide to drafting creative motions in sex abuse cases. The product is legally valid in all 50 states and Puerto Rico or any jurisdiction modeled on the U.S. Constitution. This product contains both .pdf and .docx files for you convenience.
Consolidated Motion For A Mental Evaluation Of Witness TMR To Assess Testimonial Competency
This document involves the defense of a sex offender case. This particular file is a motion for a mental evaluation of a witness. This is very useful when challenging the validity of witness testimony.
Unopposed Motion for Stay of Execution of Sentence
Defendant’s attorney requests the court to enter an order staying the execution of the sentence in this matter until such time as the merits of the appeal at all levels has been determined.Â
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
Defendant’s attorney files an unopposed motion for extension of time to file opening brief.Â
RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER
Defendant’s response to the Show Cause Order
REQUEST FOR COMPENTENCY EVALUATION PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 16-8.5-103 [10]
|
REQUEST FOR COMPENTENCY EVALUATION PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 16-8.5-103 [10] |
PEOPLE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF
People’s unopposed motion for enlargement of time to file answer brief.Â
PEOPLE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF
People’s unopposed motion for enlargement of time to file answer brief.Â
PEOPLE’S OBJECTION TO COMPTENCY EVALUATION AS INADEQUATE AND REQUEST FOR PAYMENT OF SECOND EVALUATION
District Attorney respectfully objects to the evaluation done pursuant to a competency evaluation request by the defense and requests this Honorable Court find the evaluation inadequate and order payment of the second evaluation.
PEOPLE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER UNDER RULE 16 III (d)
PEOPLE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER UNDER RULE 16 III (d)Â
Â
NOTICE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P. RULE 37 AND DESIGNATION OF RECORD
NOTICE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P. RULE 37 AND DESIGNATION OF RECORD
MOTION TO SUPRESS AUTOPSY AS A SANCTION [14]
Defendant’s motion to suppress autopsy because the defense counsel was allowed to present during the autopsy in this matter, violating the order of the court, the Colorado Bar Association Ethics Opinion, and violating C.R.C.P. 16.Â
MOTION TO SUPPRESS: THE WARRANT
|
MOTION TO SUPPRESS: THE WARRANT RELIED UPON TO SEARCH DEFENDANT’S HOME WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE IT WAS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, DID NOT IDENTIFY THE OBJECT OF THE SEARCH NOR THE PREMISES TO BE SEARCHED WITH SPECIFICITY, AND WHILE EXECUTING THE WARRANT, THE POLICE WENT BEYOND THE SCOPE ALLOWED BY THE SEARCH WARRANT, AND COLLECTED NUMEROUS ITEMS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE WARRANT [16]. |