Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE WEAPON OBTAINED THROUGH ILLEGAL SEIZURE
MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE WEAPON OBTAINED THROUGH ILLEGAL SEIZURE
DEFENDANT MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING COLLECTION OF DNA SAMPLE FROM DEFENDANT
DEFENDANT MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING COLLECTION OF DNA SAMPLE FROM DEFENDANT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF UNOPPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF UNOPPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE BY WHICH TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE BY WHICH TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL PURSUANT TO RULE 29 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL PURSUANT TO RULE 29 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404.
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION
IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404.
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’ S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’ S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ADMISSION OF VIDEO FROM OHM BAR
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ADMISSION OF VIDEO FROM OHM BAR
MOTION TO SUPPRESS AUDIO RECORDINGS OF CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN FBI INFORMANT AND DEFENDANT
MOTION TO SUPPRESS AUDIO RECORDINGS OF CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN FBI INFORMANT AND DEFENDANT
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR PROSECUTORIAL/GOVERNMENTAL MISCONDUCT AND MISUSE OF THE GRAND JURY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR PROSECUTORIAL/GOVERNMENTAL MISCONDUCT AND MISUSE OF THE GRAND JURY
Criminal Motion for Protective Order
Legal arguments on arguing a protective order limiting reenactment or demonstrative presentation at a deposition. The legal argument that good cause exist to limit an attorney use of video or pictures for reenactment or to demonstrate at a deposition is included in this document. Guidelines set forth in the United States supreme court case Emerson Elec. Co, which includes protection for unwarranted annoyance and embarrassment is included. Protection Order argument is for civil cases.