Criminal Defense
Showing 361–375 of 1727 resultsSorted by price: high to low
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE 404 (B) EVIDENCE AND FOR IN-LIMINE RULING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE 404 (B) EVIDENCE AND FOR IN-LIMINE RULING
MOTION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITION HEARING
MOTION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITION HEARING
MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF SPECIFIC DISCOVERY NO LESS THAN TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED PROCEEDING IN THIS MATTER
MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF SPECIFIC DISCOVERY NO LESS THAN TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED PROCEEDING IN THIS MATTER,
MOTION FOR ORDERS WITH RESPECT TO EXPERT DISCOVERY
MOTION FOR ORDERS WITH RESPECT TO EXPERT DISCOVERY
MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE WEAPON OBTAINED THROUGH ILLEGAL SEIZURE
MOTION TO SUPPRESS THE WEAPON OBTAINED THROUGH ILLEGAL SEIZURE
DEFENDANT MOTION TO SUPPRESS OUT-OF-COURT IDENTIFICATION AND PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AND STATEMENTS AND TO PRECLUDE IN-COURT IDENTIFICATION OF DEFENDANT
DEFENDANT MOTION TO SUPPRESS OUT-OF-COURT IDENTIFICATION AND PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AND STATEMENTS AND TO PRECLUDE IN-COURT IDENTIFICATION OF DEFENDANT
DEFENDANT MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING COLLECTION OF DNA SAMPLE FROM DEFENDANT
DEFENDANT MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING COLLECTION OF DNA SAMPLE FROM DEFENDANT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF UNOPPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF UNOPPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE BY WHICH TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE BY WHICH TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL PURSUANT TO RULE 29 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL PURSUANT TO RULE 29 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ADMISSION OF VIDEO FROM OHM BAR
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ADMISSION OF VIDEO FROM OHM BAR
MOTION TO SUPPRESS AUDIO RECORDINGS OF CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN FBI INFORMANT AND DEFENDANT
MOTION TO SUPPRESS AUDIO RECORDINGS OF CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN FBI INFORMANT AND DEFENDANT
Criminal Motion for Protective Order
Legal arguments on arguing a protective order limiting reenactment or demonstrative presentation at a deposition. The legal argument that good cause exist to limit an attorney use of video or pictures for reenactment or to demonstrate at a deposition is included in this document. Guidelines set forth in the United States supreme court case Emerson Elec. Co, which includes protection for unwarranted annoyance and embarrassment is included. Protection Order argument is for civil cases.