Response to Motion to Preclude Evidence Pertaining to Impairment Ratings
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO IMPAIRMENT RATINGS
Response to Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Traffic Citation and Conviction
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF TRAFFIC CITATION AND TRAFFIC CONVICTION
Response to Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Prior Felony Conviction
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF PRIOR FELONY CONVICTION
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Traffic Citation and Conviction
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF TRAFFIC CITATION AND TRAFFIC CONVICTION
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Prior Felony
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF PRIOR FELONY
Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained through Electronic Surveillance
FIRST MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE OBTAINED THROUGH ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE and REQUEST FOR FRANKS HEARING
Motion to Suppress Wiretape Evidence
MOTION TO SUPPRESS WIRETAP EVIDENCE AND MOTION FOR FRANKS HEARING
Motion for Notice of Plaintiff Intention to use Specific Rule 404(b) Evidence
MOTION FOR NOTICE OF PLAINTIFF INTENTION TO USE SPECIFIC RULE 404(b) EVIDENCE
Defendant Response to Provide Fingerprints
DEFENDANT REPLY TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO PROVIDE FULL CASE FINGERPRINTS AND PALM PRINTS
Motion to Produce Exculpatory and Mitigating Evidence Against Defendant of Sexual Assault
MOTION TO PRODUCE EXCULPATORY AND MITIGATING EVIDENCE IN REGARD TO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT OF SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD OR INDECENCY WITH A CHILD
Request Pursuant to Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence
REQUEST PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 37.07 § 3(g), TEXAS RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
Motion to Suppress Illegally Seized Evidence
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ILLEGALLY SEIZED EVIDENCE
Motion to Suppress Evidence of the Arrest
MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE OF THE ARREST BASED ON LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE BASED ON VIDEOTAPE AS PRESENTED IN WHITELEY V. WARDEN, WYOMING STATE PENITENTIARY
MOTION FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF STATE’S FILE TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE OF ANY EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND AND KYLES V. WHITLEY
MOTION FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF STATE’S FILE TO DETERMINE
THE EXISTENCE OF ANY EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT
UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND AND KYLES V. WHITLEY