Request Pursuant to Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence
REQUEST PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 37.07 § 3(g), TEXAS RULES OF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE
Motion to Suppress Illegally Seized Evidence
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ILLEGALLY SEIZED EVIDENCE
Motion to Suppress Evidence of the Arrest
MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE OF THE ARREST BASED ON LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE BASED ON VIDEOTAPE AS PRESENTED IN WHITELEY V. WARDEN, WYOMING STATE PENITENTIARY
MOTION FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF STATE’S FILE TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE OF ANY EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND AND KYLES V. WHITLEY
MOTION FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF STATE’S FILE TO DETERMINE
THE EXISTENCE OF ANY EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT
UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND AND KYLES V. WHITLEY
MOTION FOR HEARING PRIOR TO TRIAL PURSUANT TO RULE 705, TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE
MOTION FOR HEARING PRIOR TO TRIAL PURSUANT TO RULE 705, TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE
MOTION FOR EXAMINATION AND RE-WEIGHING OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
MOTION FOR EXAMINATION AND RE-WEIGHING OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF ALL EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND AND KYLES V. WHITLEY
MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF ALL EVIDENCE FAVORABLE TO THE DEFENDANT
UNDER BRADY V. MARYLAND AND KYLES V. WHITLEY
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
Motion to Inspect Evidence – Texas Criminal Law
MOTION TO INSPECT EVIDENCE
Motion for Production of Evidence for Expert Evaluation
MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE FOR EXPERT EVALUATION
MOTION FOR FORENSIC DNA TESTING OF SAMPLES OF SPERMATOZOA
MOTION FOR FORENSIC DNA TESTING OF SAMPLES OF SPERMATOZOA
DEFENDANT’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE