Motion In Limine To Exclude Plaintiff’s Expert From Offering Opinions Or Evidence
Motion Ito restrict or exclude the reference to the Plaintiff’s expert’s testimony as valued opinions or evidence during trial.
Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Expert From Offering Opinions or Evidence
Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Expert From Offering Opinions or Evidence
Opinion and Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants’ Motions To Preclude The Govt Experts
Motion to exclude the government’s proposed expert witnesses. The Defendant motions to challenge the two separate proposed expert witnesses from testifying in the trial.
Order Granting in Part And Denying In Part Motions To Exclude Gang Expert Testimony
Ordering that the government provided gang expert witnesses testimonies is limited on the basis that the testimony will not meet the reliability requirements of Rule 702.
Reply Re Joint Defense Motion to Exclude Gang Expert Testimony
The document responds to the Government’s refusal to obey the Court’s decision regarding the denial of the Government’s expert witnesses. The Government requested to supply expert witnesses on the Defense’s behalf; the experts lacked factual and reliable information.
Ex Parte Motion for Bilingual Mental Health Expert
Motion for the Court to allocate funds for appointing a forensic psychiatrist, who is bilingual and bicultural, to the Defendant.
Motion for Counsel, Third-Party Observer to be Present During any Govt Expert’s Mental Health Exam
Motion for Counsel, Third-Party Observer to be Present During any Govt Expert’s Mental Health Exam
product comes in both .pdf and .docx (Microsoft Word) formats for your convenience.
Have any questions regarding this product? Please feel free to email: support@attorneydocs.com
Motion to Determine Competence of Witness – Taint Hearing – Special Victims Unit
Motions the Court to analyze the interview techniques of the interviewer to determine if they undermined the reliability of the complainant’s statements and testimony. The term “competency” refers to the minimal qualifications someone must have to be a witness. In order to be a witness, a person other than an expert (experts are a special case discussed later in the course) must meet seven basic requirements. When determining competency one of the primary questions taken into account is the person’s ability to make decisions in a legal capacity.
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING
Plaintiff’s response to defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding expert.Â
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S FOURTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING
Plaintiff’s response in opposition to defendant’s fourth motion in limine regarding expert.Â
PLAINTIFFS’ FINAL LIST OF REMAINING OBJECTIONS FROM PRESERVATION DEPOSITION OF — THAT REQUIRE RULINGS
Plaintiff states their final list of remaining objections from preservation deposition of expert that require rulings.Â
PLAINTIFFS’ ADDITIONAL MOTION FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME
Plaintiff’s additional motion for one-day extension of time to file responses to defendant’s motion for summary judgement, motion for determination of law and motion for partial summary judgment as to the conduct of expert.Â
DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME
Defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding the testimony of expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S ORDER RE: DEPOSITION
Defendant’s requests the court to reconsider objections which were upheld by Division 3 in their review of the deposition of expert.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.