Expert Witness
Showing 91–105 of 194 resultsSorted by average rating
Motion in Limine to Exclude or Limit Expert Testimony in a Sexual Crimes Case
This product is a motion in limine to limit expert testimony in a sex crimes case.
This product is legally relevant in all U.S. 50 states and territories. This product comes in .docx (Microsoft Word) format for your convenience.
Have any questions regarding this product? Please feel free to email: support@attorneydocs.com
In U.S. law, a motion in limine is a motion, discussed outside the presence of the jury, to request that certain testimony be excluded. The motion is decided by a judge in both civil and criminal proceedings.
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING
Plaintiff’s response to defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding expert.Â
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S FOURTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING
Plaintiff’s response in opposition to defendant’s fourth motion in limine regarding expert.Â
PLAINTIFFS’ FINAL LIST OF REMAINING OBJECTIONS FROM PRESERVATION DEPOSITION OF — THAT REQUIRE RULINGS
Plaintiff states their final list of remaining objections from preservation deposition of expert that require rulings.Â
PLAINTIFFS’ ADDITIONAL MOTION FOR ONE-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME
Plaintiff’s additional motion for one-day extension of time to file responses to defendant’s motion for summary judgement, motion for determination of law and motion for partial summary judgment as to the conduct of expert.Â
DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME
Defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding the testimony of expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S ORDER RE: DEPOSITION
Defendant’s requests the court to reconsider objections which were upheld by Division 3 in their review of the deposition of expert.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
Defendant’s motion to ask the court to prevent plaintiff’s from introducing the testimony from their expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME VALUATIONS
Defendant’s fifth motion in limine regarding valuations performed by a person that is an expert witness for plaintiff.Â
MOTION FOR EXPERT ENDORSEMENT AND DISCLOSURES [DEF – 3]
|
MOTION FOR EXPERT ENDORSEMENT AND DISCLOSURES [DEF – 3] |
Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Defendants’ Experts
 Plaintiff’s motion to limit the testimony of four of the defendants’ experts.Â
Plaintiffs’ Notice of Partial Withdrawal of Expert Disclosures Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) and Response to Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Experts Under Colo. R. Evid. 702
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL OF EXPERT DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ EXPERTS UNDER COLO. R. EVID. 702
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Defendants’ Designated Experts Pursuant to C.R.E. 702
Defendant’s motion for an Order excluding at the trial of this matter the testimony of four purported experts proffered by Defendants