Health Care
Showing 61–75 of 119 resultsSorted by price: low to high
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Plaintiff’s Response and Objections to Defendant’s Bill of Costs
Plaintiff’s Response and Objections to Defendant’s Bill of Costs
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Prior Claims and Board Matters
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Prior Claims and Board Matters
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Certain Non-Scientific Opinions of Plaintiff’s Expert
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Certain Non-Scientific Opinions of Plaintiff’s Expert
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Strike Materials Submitted with Plaintiff’s Motion for a New Trial and Objection to Hearing
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Strike Materials Submitted with Plaintiff’s Motion for a New Trial and Objection to Hearing
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Damages for Paralegal Expenses Plaintiff Did Not Incur
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Damages for Paralegal Expenses Plaintiff Did Not Incur
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Untimely Motion to Exclude Certain Unqualified Opinions of Plaintiff’s Expert
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Untimely Motion to Exclude Certain Unqualified Opinions of Plaintiff’s Expert
Reply in Support of Verified Bill of Costs
Reply in Support of Verified Bill of Costs
Motion for Protective Order and in Camera Review
Motion for Protective Order and in Camera Review
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
Response to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude any Evidence of Medical Expense Payments from any Collateral Source
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OF MEDICAL EXPENSE PAYMENTS FROM ANY COLLATERAL SOURCE
Response to Defendant’s Motion to Prohibit Plaintiff from Asking Any Medical Expert Whether the Conduct of Physicians, was “Foreseeable”
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT PLAINTIFF FROM ASKING ANY MEDICAL EXPERT WHETHER THE CONDUCT OF , OR OTHER UCH PHYSICIANS, WAS “FORESEEABLE
Joint Motion to Modify Case Management Order
Joint Motion to Modify Case Management Order
Second Joint Motion to Modify Case Management Order
Second Joint Motion to Modify Case Management Order