Litigation
Showing 451–465 of 655 resultsSorted by price: low to high
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Motion to Strike – Federal Court
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE ARGUMENTS RAISED FOR FIRST TIME IN REPLY, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY
Motion to Dismiss – Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(2)
Motion to Strike a New Affidavit
PLAINTIFF MOTION TO STRIKE THE NEW AFFIDAVIT, EXHIBITS, AND ARGUMENTS ON WHICH DEFENDANT RELIES IN ITS REPLY, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY
Motion in limine that defendant did not recive ticket
In a auto accident case plaintiff filed motion to limit the defense from mentioning that defendant did not get a ticket
Motion to Compel
compelling disclosure of the mandatory disclosure documents required by C.R.C.P. 16.2(e).
Plaintiff Response to Motion for Sanctions
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO ATTEND DEPOSITION
Defendant’s Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint and Jury Demand
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND to negligence arguing comparative negligence
Defendant’s Answer, Cross-Claim and Jury Demand
DEFENDANT’S ANSWER, CROSS-CLAIM AND JURY DEMAND cross claim for breach of contract and promissory estoppel
Response to Motion for Entry of Default
Response to Motion for Entry of Default
Reply to Defendant’s Counterclaims
REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS
Defendant/Counterclaimant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion & Brief for Summary Judgment
Defendant/Counterclaimant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion; Brief for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike and Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs
Response in Opposition to Defendant Motion for Summary Judgment
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1)The Reasonable Foreseeability of Plaintiff’s Damages is a Fact Question
Response to “Defendant/ Counter Claimant’s Motion for Summary Judgment”
RESPONSE TO “DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT” Civil Theft, Conversion & Trespass
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Standard of Care Opinions
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE STANDARD OF CARE OPINIONS BY —, PURSUANT TO C.R.E. 702