Defendant’s Motion In Limine Re: Initial Contact
Defendant in an Immigration case seeking to exclude the reasons for, and facts that, he was in jail when ICE agents made contact with him.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine Re: Statements Within Immigration
Immigration Defendant seeking to exclude statements made to ICE and other government agents in prior contacts with ICE and other law enforcement regarding his immigration status (Defendant exercised the 5th in this case). US District Court for the District of Arizona.
Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence of Other and Subsequent Acts
Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence of Other and Subsequent Acts
Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Medical Board Investigation
Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Medical Board Investigation
Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Improper Opinion Testimony
Defendant’s Motion in Limine to exclude specific improper opinion testimony. Filed in the US istrict Court for the Western District of California, the motion, with exhibits, seeks to exclude improperly disclosed (or undisclosed) and otherwise impermissible opinion testimony under Rule 16(G).
Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Preclude Evidence of Uncharged Tax Years
Motion by a criminal defendant in the US District Court for the Western District of California to preclude the inclusion of specific evidence. In this case, to exclude evidence of tax filings for ax years not included in the Government’s charges.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404
Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine Regarding Vehicle Photographs and Argument of Counsel
Defendant response in opposition of plaintiff’s motion in limine to not allow vehicle pictures.
Defendant’s Response to Government’s Motion in Limine to Introduce Evidence as Intrinsic Evidence and Pursuant to Fed. Rule of Evid 404(b)
Defendant’s Response to Government’s Motion in Limine to Introduce Evidence as Intrinsic Evidence and Pursuant to Fed. Rule of Evid 404(b)
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion on Admissibilty of Insurance for Purposes of Establishing Bias
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S TRIAL BRIEF (MOTION IN LIMINE) ON ADMISSIBILITY OF INSURANCE FOR PURPOSES OF ESTABLISHING BIAS
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion in Limine Regarding Gifts
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion in Limine Regarding Gifts
DEFENDANT’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC HEARING
Defendant’s counsel certifies that he has attempted to contact plaintiff’s counsel several times and received no response prior to filing this motion. Defendant filed a motion in Limine regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.Â
DEFENDANT’S FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME VALUATIONS
Defendant’s fifth motion in limine regarding valuations performed by a person that is an expert witness for plaintiff.Â
DEFENDANT’S FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant’s first motion in limine regarding the hypothetical settlement scenarios that states the pursuant to CRCP 121, counsel certifies conferral with counsel for plaintiff who objects to the relief requested.Â