Defendants’ Combined Motions in Limine
Defendants motion to exclude from trial testimony and evidence of (1) expiration of the statute of limitations against; (2) Defendants’ budget, profit, and bonus policies; (3) irrelevant previous crimes; (4) Defendants’ firearm policy; (5) subsequent remedial measures; (6) Defendants’ alleged failure to produce evidence; (7) Plaintiffs’ injuries; (8) insurance coverage; and (9) placing the jury into the Plaintiffs’ position.
Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine to Admit into Evidence a Copy of the Notebook Written, Kept and Maintained by Shooter
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE TO ADMIT INTO EVIDENCE A COPY OF THE NOTEBOOK WRITTEN, KEPT AND MAINTAINED BY SHOOTER
DEFENDANT’S FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME VALUATIONS
Defendant’s fifth motion in limine regarding valuations performed by a person that is an expert witness for plaintiff.
DEFENDANT’S FOURTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME
Defendant’s fourth motion in limine regarding conduct, advice, actions or inaction of plaintiff’s witness.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
Defendant’s motion to ask the court to prevent plaintiff’s from introducing the testimony from their expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER ON FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant submits a reply in support of its motion for clarification of the order on defendant’s first motion regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant’s reply to plaintiff’s response to the first motion regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE RE: DEFENDANT’S NAME INSURANCE EXCHANGE’S “OPPORTUNITY TO SETTLE”
Defendant’s response and objections to plaintiff’s motion regarding defendant’s “opportunity to settle”.
DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s second motion regarding PEV or reserve information.
DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME
Defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding the testimony of expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S THIRD MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING RIGHTS VERSUS DUTIES
Defendant’s third motion in limine regarding rights versus duties states that pursuant to CRCP 121, counsel certifies conferral with counsel for plaintiff who object to the relief requested.
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE RE: DEFENDANT’S “OPPORTUNITY TO SETTLE”
Plaintiff’s motion in limine Re: Defendant’s “opportunity to settle”
PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE RE: DEFENDANT’S “OPPORTUNITY TO SETTLE”
Plaintiff’s reply in support of motion in limine RE: defendant’s “opportunity to settle”.
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
|
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS. |