Motion to Dismiss
Showing 121–135 of 185 resultsSorted by price: low to high
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint/Information
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint/Information
Motion to Confess Judgment on Promissory Note, Dismiss all Related Claims, and Request for Forthwith Ruling
MOTION TO CONFESS JUDGMENT ON PROMISSORY NOTE AND DISMISS ALL RELATED CLAIMS AND REQUEST FOR FORTHWITH RULING 2. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that the Court dismiss with prejudice all claims related to the Note, including Plaintiffs’ claim for Negligent Misrepresentation against Defendant– Water Shares (Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, Fifth Claim for Relief) and the Defendants’ Counterclaim for Breach of Contract under the terms of the Note (Defendants’ Answer, Jury Demand, and Counterclaim, First and Second Claims for Relief in the Counterclaim).
DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON FAILURE TO STATE AN OFFENSE AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON FAILURE TO STATE AN OFFENSE
AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT DUE TO THE DESTRUCTION OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE/ IN
THE ALTERNATIVE REQUEST FOR SPOLIATION INSTRUCTION
Motion to Dismiss
Motion to Dismiss for failure to state Colorado Consumer Protection Act
Motion to Dismiss Claims in Complaint
DEFENDANT MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S NINTH AND THIRTEENTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) dealoing with inventors and patent claims
Motion to Stay
Motion to Stay Pending Mediation and ruling on Motion to Dismiss
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, For Appropriate Sanctions
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P 16(III)(g)
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT
MOTION TO DISMISS or in the alternative MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
MOTION TO DISMISS or in the alternative MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REFERRAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REFERRAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS, FOR
REVIEW OF THIS PROSECUTION TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT SHOULD BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE POLICIES REGARDING DUPLICATIVE PROSECUTIONS
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ALL COUNTS OF THE INDICTMENT DOUBLE JEOPARDY
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ALL COUNTS OF THE INDICTMENT ON THE GROUNDS THAT THIS FEDERAL PROSECUTION VIOLATES THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS ONE AND TWO OF THE THIRD SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT
MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS ONE AND TWO OF THE THIRD SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT
MOTION TO DISMISS VIOLATES DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS
MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS 1 AND 2 OF THE THIRD SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT ON THE GROUNDS
THAT 18 U.S.C. § 1512(f)(1), AS IT IS BEING APPLIED IN THIS CASE, VIOLATES THE EX POST FACTO CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND IT VIOLATES DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO PROCEDURAL DUE
PROCESS
MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON FALSE EVIDENCE
MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON FALSE EVIDENCE