Response to Defendant’s Motion To Preclude Plaintiff From Asking Any Expert…
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFF FROM ASKING ANY EXPERT ON EITHER SIDE WHETHER WERE “NEGLIGENT”
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Defendant – Malpractice
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF DEFENDANT,
AND NAME
Motion to Exclude any Evidence of Medical Payments from Collateral Source
MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OF MEDICAL EXPENSE PAYMENTS FROM ANY COLLATERAL SOURCE
Motion to Strike Defendant’s Affirmative Defense & Preclusion of Inadmissable Evidence
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NONPARTY AT FAULT AND TO PRECLUDE INADMISSABLE EVIDENCE CONCERNING ALLEGED NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT OF UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO PROVIDERS
Unopposed Motion to Take Deposition Outside of Discovery Deadline
PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TAKE DEPOSITION OUTSIDE OF THE DISCOVERY DEADLINE
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Submit Under Seal
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT UNDER SEAL AND FOR IN CAMERA REVIEWOFCONFIDENTIAL EXHIBIT 9 TO PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT EX PARTE MEETINGS WITH SOME OF PLAINTIFF’S TREATING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS, HEARING REQUESTED
Notice of Motion & Motion to Dismiss The Complaint
Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the Complaint
Motion to Suppress DUI Breath Test
MOTION TO SUPPRESS BREATH TEST
Motion to suppress breath test on notion road side tests were taken illegally and arrest were warrantless.
Implied consent laws generally require all drivers lawfully arrested for a DUI to submit to chemical testing (normally, a breath or blood test). However, many states make prearrest PAS tests optional—meaning, there’s no legal consequence for a driver who refuses a PAS test.
Motion for Reconsideration of Ruling & Petition for Review of Magistrate’s Order
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DISTRICT COURT’S RULING AND ORDER ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE’S ORDER
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Standard of Care Opinions
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE STANDARD OF CARE OPINIONS BY —, PURSUANT TO C.R.E. 702
Post-Conviction Motion to Withdraw Plea
Post-Conviction Motion to Withdraw Plea Criminal Law – Wisconsin
Motion to Require Disclosure of Confidential Informers
MOTION TO REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMERS IDENTITY
Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment – Employment Law
Brief and motion for summary judgment Title VII Discrimination, (2) Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy as set forth in the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, C.R.S. 24-34-402, and (3) Violation of the Colorado Wage Claim Act, C.R.S. 8-4-101.
Unopposed Motion to Permit Business Travel
Unopposed Motion to Permit Business Travel