Experts Live Testimony – Criminal Defense Legal Document
Document requesting those involved in finding criminalistics in a case to testify in court.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Testimony
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Testimony
Defendant Counter-Designations and Objections Regarding Deposition Testimony
DEFENDANT COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS REGARDING DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF —
Form UCCJEA-7a (UCCJEA – Order on Electronic Testimony Application)
Form UCCJEA-7a (UCCJEA – Order on Electronic Testimony Application)
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Portions of Expert Testimony
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Portions of Expert Testimony
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike His Proposed Testimony
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike His Proposed Testimony
Plaintiff Encore 7074, LLC’s Objections to Designation of Deposition Testimony
Plaintiff Encore 7074, LLC’s Objections to Designation of Deposition Testimony
Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion in Limine to Exclude Charles Riley as a Witness and to Exclude Improper Testimony Concerning
Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion in Limine to Exclude Charles Riley as a Witness and to Exclude Improper Testimony Concerning
Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion In Limine to Exclude Improper Expert Testimony
Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion In Limine to Exclude Improper Expert Testimony
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2]
|
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2] |
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
Defendant’s motion to ask the court to prevent plaintiff’s from introducing the testimony from their expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.