Legal Document Shop
Showing 1681–1695 of 5171 resultsSorted by price: high to low
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant’s reply to plaintiff’s response to the first motion regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER ON FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant submits a reply in support of its motion for clarification of the order on defendant’s first motion regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
Defendant’s motion to ask the court to prevent plaintiff’s from introducing the testimony from their expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S COMBINED REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF LAW, AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE CONDUCT
Defendant’s combined reply in support of motions for summary judgment, motion for determination of law, and motion for partial summary judgement as to the conduct of a person.Â
ANSWER AND JURY DEMAND
Defendant’s answer to Plaintiff’s complaint and defendant’s jury demand.Â
RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER
Defendant’s response to the Show Cause Order
REQUEST FOR COMPENTENCY EVALUATION PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 16-8.5-103 [10]
REQUEST FOR COMPENTENCY EVALUATION PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 16-8.5-103 [10] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P. RULE 37 AND DESIGNATION OF RECORD
NOTICE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P. RULE 37 AND DESIGNATION OF RECORD
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2]
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2] |
Plaintiffs’ Notice of Partial Withdrawal of Expert Disclosures Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) and Response to Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Experts Under Colo. R. Evid. 702
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL OF EXPERT DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ EXPERTS UNDER COLO. R. EVID. 702
Defendants’ Notice of Removal – Personal Injury
Defendant’s notice of removal to remove the instant case to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. A notice of removal is signed by the defendants and filed in federal court to begin the process of transferring the civil action from state court to federal court. Promptly after the filing of such notice of removal of a civil action the defendant or defendants shall give written notice thereof to all adverse parties and shall file a copy of the notice with the clerk of such State court, which shall effect the removal and the State court shall proceed no further.
Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion to Dismiss by the Retail Property Trust and Simon Entities
Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint by the Retail Property Trust and Simon entities.Â