Legal Document Shop
Showing 1441–1455 of 5176 resultsSorted by price: high to low
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Plaintiff’s Response and Objections to Notice to Take the Videotaped Deposition of and Subpoena Duces Tecum
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AND OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE THE VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION aND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
Response to Defendant’s Motion to Prohibit Plaintiff from Asking Any Medical Expert Whether the Conduct of Physicians, was “Foreseeable”
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT PLAINTIFF FROM ASKING ANY MEDICAL EXPERT WHETHER THE CONDUCT OF , OR OTHER UCH PHYSICIANS, WAS “FORESEEABLE
Response to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude any Evidence of Medical Expense Payments from any Collateral Source
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OF MEDICAL EXPENSE PAYMENTS FROM ANY COLLATERAL SOURCE
Response to Plaintiff’s Shreck Motion to Preclude Testimony of Doctor
Defendant RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ SHRECK MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF DR. A
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support Thereof
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF on SEX-BASED HOSTILE WORKING ENVIRONMENT
Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s affirmative Defense of Nonparty at fault
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NONPARTY AT FAULT
First Supplamental Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Affirmative Defense
DEFENDANT’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NONPARTY AT FAULT AND TO PRECLUDE INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE CONCERNING ALLEGED NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s C.R.M. 7 Petition for Review of Magistrate’s Order
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT C.R.M. 7 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE’S ORDER RE: (1) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) EXPERT DISCLOSURE OF —; AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S EIGHTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE AND PRECLUDE OPINIONS OF
Motion to Suppress Evidence of Wire Communications
Motion to Suppress Evidence of Wire Communications
Agreement for Legal Services
A quasi agreement of flat fee and contingent. I use in complex cases to make sure I get some of my fees covered even if there is no judgment
Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for New Trial – Medical Malpractice
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
Response to Defendant’s Motion To Preclude Plaintiff From Asking Any Expert…
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFF FROM ASKING ANY EXPERT ON EITHER SIDE WHETHER WERE “NEGLIGENT”
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Standard of Care Opinions
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE STANDARD OF CARE OPINIONS BY —, PURSUANT TO C.R.E. 702
Response in Opposition to Defendant + Motion for Allocation of Damages
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION FOR ALLOCATION OF DAMAGES