Legal Document Shop
Showing 3481–3495 of 5171 resultsSorted by price: low to high
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2]
|
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P. RULE 37 AND DESIGNATION OF RECORD
NOTICE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P. RULE 37 AND DESIGNATION OF RECORD
REQUEST FOR COMPENTENCY EVALUATION PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 16-8.5-103 [10]
|
REQUEST FOR COMPENTENCY EVALUATION PURSUANT TO C.R.S. 16-8.5-103 [10] |
RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER
Defendant’s response to the Show Cause Order
ANSWER AND JURY DEMAND
Defendant’s answer to Plaintiff’s complaint and defendant’s jury demand.
DEFENDANT’S COMBINED REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF LAW, AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE CONDUCT
Defendant’s combined reply in support of motions for summary judgment, motion for determination of law, and motion for partial summary judgement as to the conduct of a person.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
Defendant’s motion to ask the court to prevent plaintiff’s from introducing the testimony from their expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER ON FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant submits a reply in support of its motion for clarification of the order on defendant’s first motion regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO FIRST MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING HYPOTHETICAL SETTLEMENT SCENARIOS
Defendant’s reply to plaintiff’s response to the first motion regarding hypothetical settlement scenarios.
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S ORDER RE: DEPOSITION
Defendant’s requests the court to reconsider objections which were upheld by Division 3 in their review of the deposition of expert.
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE RE: DEFENDANT’S NAME INSURANCE EXCHANGE’S “OPPORTUNITY TO SETTLE”
Defendant’s response and objections to plaintiff’s motion regarding defendant’s “opportunity to settle”.
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT TO INCLUDE A PRAYER FOR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES
Defendant’s response to plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint to include a prayer for exemplary damages.
DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND RULING
Defendant’s unopposed request for clarification and ruling states that the undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for plaintiff who does not object to the relief requested in the motion.