Legal Document Shop
Showing 3721–3735 of 5171 resultsSorted by price: low to high
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Reply to Defendant’s Counterclaims
REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS
Defendant/Counterclaimant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion & Brief for Summary Judgment
Defendant/Counterclaimant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion; Brief for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike and Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs
Response in Opposition to Defendant Motion for Summary Judgment
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1)The Reasonable Foreseeability of Plaintiff’s Damages is a Fact Question
Plaintiff response to motion in limine
Plaintiff response to motion in limine Re: email
Response to “Defendant/ Counter Claimant’s Motion for Summary Judgment”
RESPONSE TO “DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT” Civil Theft, Conversion & Trespass
Response in Opposition to Defendant + Motion for Allocation of Damages
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION FOR ALLOCATION OF DAMAGES
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Standard of Care Opinions
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE STANDARD OF CARE OPINIONS BY —, PURSUANT TO C.R.E. 702
Response to Defendant’s Motion To Preclude Plaintiff From Asking Any Expert…
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFF FROM ASKING ANY EXPERT ON EITHER SIDE WHETHER WERE “NEGLIGENT”
Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for New Trial – Medical Malpractice
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
Agreement for Legal Services
A quasi agreement of flat fee and contingent. I use in complex cases to make sure I get some of my fees covered even if there is no judgment
Motion to Suppress Evidence of Wire Communications
Motion to Suppress Evidence of Wire Communications
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s C.R.M. 7 Petition for Review of Magistrate’s Order
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT C.R.M. 7 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE’S ORDER RE: (1) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) EXPERT DISCLOSURE OF —; AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S EIGHTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE AND PRECLUDE OPINIONS OF
First Supplamental Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Affirmative Defense
DEFENDANT’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NONPARTY AT FAULT AND TO PRECLUDE INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE CONCERNING ALLEGED NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT
Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s affirmative Defense of Nonparty at fault
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NONPARTY AT FAULT