Legal Document Shop
Showing 3826–3840 of 5171 resultsSorted by popularity
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Plaintiff’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on Back Pay
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON BACK PAY after receiving a judgment on title VII case
Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees
After receiving a judgment in employment case Plaintiff is requesting attorney fees as prevailing party
Defendat’s Combined Motions in Limine
DEFENDANT’S COMBINED MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Discrimination complaint
Title VII complaint with Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy as set forth in the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act
Entry of Apperance, Request for Discovery, Verification of Advisement, Waiver of First Appearance
ENTRY OF APEARANCE, REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY, VERIFICATION OF ADVISEMENT, WAVIER OF FIRST APPEARANCE
Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s affirmative Defense of Nonparty at fault
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NONPARTY AT FAULT
Plaintiff’s Trial Brief on Admissabilty of Insurance for Purposes of Establishing Bias
PLAINTIFF’S TRIAL BRIEF ON ADMISSABILITIY OF INSURANCE FOR PURPOSES OF ESTABLISHING BIAS
First Supplamental Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Affirmative Defense
DEFENDANT’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NONPARTY AT FAULT AND TO PRECLUDE INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE CONCERNING ALLEGED NEGLIGENCE OR FAULT
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Post-Trial Motion to Exceed the $1,000,000.00 Cap
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S POST-TRIAL MOTION TO EXCEED THE $1,000,000.00 CAP CONTAINED IN C.R.S. § 13-64-302(1)(b)
Plaintiff’s Post-Trial Motion to Exceed the $1,000,000.00 Cap
PLAINTIFF’S POST-TRIAL MOTION TO EXCEED THE $1,000,000.00 CAP CONTAINED IN C.R.S. § 13-64-302(1)(b)
Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea Pursuant to Sec. 971.08(2), Stats
Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea Pursuant to Sec. 971.08(2), Stats
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s C.R.M. 7 Petition for Review of Magistrate’s Order
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT C.R.M. 7 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE’S ORDER RE: (1) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) EXPERT DISCLOSURE OF —; AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S EIGHTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE AND PRECLUDE OPINIONS OF
Defendant C.R.M. 7 Petition for Review of Magistrate’s Orders
DEFENDANT C.R.M. 7 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE’S ORDERS RE: (1) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL C.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) EXPERT DISCLOSURE OF ROGER NICHOLS, M.D; AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S EIGHTH SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE AND PRECLUDE OPINIONS OF —.
Motion to Declare Sec. 948.02(1), Stats Unconstitutional as Applied to Defendant
Motion to Declare Sec. 948.02(1), Stats Unconstitutional as Applied to DEFENDANT