MOTION TO SUPPRESS: THE WARRANT

MOTION TO SUPPRESS: THE WARRANT RELIED UPON TO SEARCH DEFENDANT’S HOME WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE IT WAS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, DID NOT IDENTIFY THE OBJECT OF THE SEARCH NOR THE PREMISES TO BE SEARCHED WITH SPECIFICITY, AND WHILE EXECUTING THE WARRANT, THE POLICE WENT BEYOND THE SCOPE ALLOWED BY THE SEARCH WARRANT, AND COLLECTED NUMEROUS ITEMS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE WARRANT [16].