Request to File New Litigation by Vexatious Litigant
Request to File New Litigation by Vexatious Litigant
Prefiling Order–Vexatious Litigant
Prefiling Order–Vexatious Litigant
Voire dire questions for qualifying expert
Questions used to qualifying an expert
Duplicative Experts, Motion in limine to preclude
Motion in limine to preclude duplicative expert testimony
Product Liability Lawsuit – Federal Court Civil Complaint and Jury Demand
Federal Court Civil Complaint, including claims for Strict Liability, Product Liability-Failure to Warn, Negligence, Breach of Warranty- Express and Implied, Fraud, Fraudulent Concealment, and Negligent Representation.
Product liability is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products cause.
Product Defects: Responsible Parties
For product liability to arise, at some point the product must have been sold in the marketplace. Historically, a contractual relationship, known as “privity of contract,” had to exist between the person injured by a product and the supplier of the product in order for the injured person to recover. In most states today, however, that requirement no longer exists, and the injured person does not have to be the purchaser of the product in order to recover. Any person who foreseeably could have been injured by a defective product can recover for his or her injuries, as long as the product was sold to someone.
Liability for a product defect could rest with any party in the product’s chain of distribution, such as:
-The product manufacturer;
-A manufacturer of component parts;
-A party that assembles or installs the product;
-The wholesaler; and
-The retail store that sold the product to the consumer.
Federal Court Civil Complaint with Request for Injunctive Relief
Federal Civil Complaint based on diversity of citizenship, and including claims for misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract; includes request for injunctive relief. US District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Plaintiff’s Brief in Support of Motion for Temporary Injunction and Expedited Discovery
Plaintiff’s Brief in support of motion for temporary injunction and expedited discovery, from the US District Court for the District of Minnesota. Companion Objection to same, as well as the original complaint, available on Lawyers Help Lawyers as well.
Federal Civil Complaint for Default on Promissory Note
Federal Civil Court Complaint for default on a promissory note. Diversity case out of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Federal Civil Complaint for Copyright Infringement
Federal Civil Complaint for violation of copyright.
As a general matter, copyright infringement occurs when a copyrighted work is reproduced, distributed, performed, publicly displayed, or made into a derivative work without the permission of the copyright owner.
Copyright infringement can be a felony or a misdemeanor. A felony charge must involve an infringement of the copyright owner’s reproduction or distribution rights. A felony conviction carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a maximum fine of $250,000.
Copyright infringement is using someone else’s work without getting that person’s permission. … The owner of a copyright gets to decide who can legally make copies of that work. It is illegal to copy large sections of someone else’s copyrighted work without permission, even if you give the original author credit.
The legal penalties for copyright infringement are: Infringer pays the actual dollar amount of damages and profits. The law provides a range from $200 to $150,000 for each work infringed. Infringer pays for all attorneys fees and court costs.
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support of Motion for Approval of Plan for Class Notice
Plaintiff’s Brief in support of class action notice to class members following class certification. US District Court for the District of Colorado.
Civil Complaint for Damages, Declaratory Relief, Extraordinary Writs, and Preliminary Injunction
Federal Civil Rights Complaint (42 USC 1983), including requests for damages, injunction, extraordinary writs, and declaratory relief out of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Declaratory relief refers to a judgment of a court which determines the rights of parties without ordering anything be done or awarding damages. By seeking a declaratory judgment, the party making the request is seeking for an official declaration of the status of a matter in controversy.
The declaratory judgment is generally considered a statutory remedy and not an equitable remedy in the United States, and is thus not subject to equitable requirements, though there are analogies that can be found in the remedies granted by courts of equity.
Declaratory relief refers to a judgment of a court which determines the rights of parties without ordering anything be done or awarding damages. By seeking a declaratory judgment, the party making the request is seeking for an official declaration of the status of a matter in controversy.
Defendant’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss
Defense Brief supporting motion to dismiss a misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract case under diversity jurisdiction. US District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Federal Civil Complaint under 42 USC 1983 (Excessive Force)
Civil Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 for police use of excessive force. US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Federal Civil Complaint under ERISA
Federal ciil complaint brought under ERISA against Veteran’s Affairs. US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.