Civil Litigation
Showing 826–840 of 1216 resultsSorted by price: low to high
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Response to Motion for Summary Judgment
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION AND BRIEF FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH CLAIM (BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY) AND FIFTH CLAIM (BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE)
Response to Motion to Exclude Testimony of Non-Retained Experts
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF NON-RETAINED EXPERTS
Defendant Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of “Small Print”
DEFENDANT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF “SMALL PRINT” DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES PURSUANT TO THE UCC
PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO MODIFY TEMPORARY ORDERS
PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO MODIFY TEMPORARY ORDERS
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO MODIFY CHILD SUPPORT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO MODIFY CHILD SUPPORT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD
Verified Response: Verified Motion to Receiver
VERIFIED RESPONSE: VERIFIED MOTION TO RECEIVER
Defendants Ground’s Response to Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Appointment of Receiver
DEFENDANT GROUND’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER
Defendants-Counterclaimant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement
DEFENDANTS-COUNTERCLAIMANTS’
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARYJUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
PLAINTIFF’ S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS based on Qualified Immunity
Amended answer to PI lawsuit
Amended answer for a auto accident case, whereas the manufacturer was sued for defective vehicle. Sample answers including not doing business in state of Colorado, other affirmative defenses.
Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Defendants’ Experts
Plaintiff’s motion to limit the testimony of four of the defendants’ experts.
Reply in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
Plaintiff’s reply in support of defendant’s motion for pro hac vice admission.
Confidentiality Agreement for Employees/Consultants of Art Advisory Services
This Confidentiality Agreement is for employees or consultants who provide art advisory and consultation services. It contains provisions that are specific to the fine art world and has tailored provisions for “family” like employers who may have unique confidentiality requirements relative to a large organization.