Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
15-Minute Voir Dire Sample Questions
This document states the basic voir dire of getting the panel to talk by gathering information, remind the jury about the truths they already know. This document also contains the jury questionnaire, and a way to develop a challenge for cause.
Motion to Dismiss or Impose Sanctions Against the Prosecution for Violation of Brady, Discovery Order
Motion to Dismiss or Impose Sanctions Against the Prosecution for Violation of Brady, Discovery Order
This product is legally relevant in all U.S. 50 states and territories. This product comes in both .pdf and .docx (Microsoft Word) formats for your convenience.
Have any questions regarding this product? Please feel free to email: support@attorneydocs.com
Brady Rule Definition: The suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment. … “Brady requires disclosure of the material exculpatory evidence early enough so that the defense can make use of the information.
Appellant’s Opening Brief
Appellant’s opening brief concerning the case where the appellant is charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, careless driving, resisting arrest and obstruction of police.
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2]
|
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2] |
MOTION FOR NON-TESTIMONIAL IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE
 MOTION FOR NON-TESTIMONIAL IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE
MOTION FOR NOTICE PURSUANT TO C.R.E. 404(B) [DEF – 4]
Defendant’s request the Court order the prosecution to give notice of intent to admit evidence pursuant to C.R.E. 404(b).
MOTION TO AMEND
District Attorney respectfully moves this Court to Amend Count XII, Assault in The First Degree, C.R.S. §18-3-202(1)(a), of the information filed against the defendant to be Assault in the First Degree, C.R.S. §18-3-202(1)(b).
MOTION TO SEVER POSESSION OF A WEAPON BY A PREVIOUS OFFENDER FROM THE OTHER CHARGES [DEF – 1]
Defendant seeks an order severing the Possession of a Weapon Count from the other counts of Driving Under the Influence, Lane Usage Violation, Possession of a an Illegal Weapon, Prohibited Use of a Weapon, and Possession of Alcohol in a Motor Vehicle.
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE SEIZED PURSUANT TO DEFFECTIVE ARREST WARRANT [17]
|
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE SEIZED PURSUANT TO DEFFECTIVE ARREST WARRANT [17] |
MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE, OBSERVATIONS AND STATEMENTS OBTAINED IN VIOLATION OF — RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS [DEF – 7]
|
MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE, OBSERVATIONS AND STATEMENTS OBTAINED IN VIOLATION OF — RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS      [DEF – 7] |
MOTION TO SUPPRESS: THE WARRANT
|
MOTION TO SUPPRESS: THE WARRANT RELIED UPON TO SEARCH DEFENDANT’S HOME WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE IT WAS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, DID NOT IDENTIFY THE OBJECT OF THE SEARCH NOR THE PREMISES TO BE SEARCHED WITH SPECIFICITY, AND WHILE EXECUTING THE WARRANT, THE POLICE WENT BEYOND THE SCOPE ALLOWED BY THE SEARCH WARRANT, AND COLLECTED NUMEROUS ITEMS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE WARRANT [16]. |
NOTICE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P. RULE 37 AND DESIGNATION OF RECORD
NOTICE OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO C.R.Cr.P. RULE 37 AND DESIGNATION OF RECORD
PEOPLE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER UNDER RULE 16 III (d)
PEOPLE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER UNDER RULE 16 III (d)Â
Â
PEOPLE’S OBJECTION TO COMPTENCY EVALUATION AS INADEQUATE AND REQUEST FOR PAYMENT OF SECOND EVALUATION
District Attorney respectfully objects to the evaluation done pursuant to a competency evaluation request by the defense and requests this Honorable Court find the evaluation inadequate and order payment of the second evaluation.