Criminal Law
Showing 1396–1410 of 1816 resultsSorted by average rating
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Criminal History, Motion in Limine to Preclude Mention of
Motion in limine to preclude mention of Plaintiff’s criminal conviction/history
No “Unavoidable Accident” Defense, Motion in Limine
Motion in limine to preclude an affirmative defense of unavoidable accident
Traffic collision report, MIL to exclude
Motion in limine to exclude the traffic collision report
Plaintiff Did Not Use Insurance, Motion in Limine to Preclude Mention
Plaintiff’s MIL to preclude mention that Plaintiff did not use insurance for medical care
Electronic Openings, Motion in Limine to Allow
MIL re Electronic Openings
Motion to Obtain Police File – Criminal Motion
Most jurisdictions have a procedure for a defendant who alleges that an officer was an aggressor to access the officer’s personnel records. The defense might have to request the records from the prosecution, a different agency that has “custody” of them, or both.
Personnel records often contain citizen complaints and other notations of officer misconduct. The theory behind giving the defense access to them is that documentation of prior acts of aggression by the officer will corroborate the defendant’s claim. And the defense can follow the lead of the personnel files, conducting its own investigation of the officer’s past behavior.
Can the Public Get Police Records?
– Access to records relating to potential police misbehavior isn’t always limited to criminal defendants. Sometimes the public is entitled to information about police behavior of public concern. For example, California has a law saying the following types of police personnel records and records maintained by government agencies have to be made available to the public:
– a record relating to a report, investigation, or finding of a police officer firing a weapon at someone or using force that caused great bodily injury or death
– records having to do with a finding of sexual assault by a police officer against a member of the public, and
– records pertaining to a finding of police officer dishonesty in relation to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a case (for example, concealing evidence).
– Under the California law, all kinds of materials that fit into one of the above categories have to be released, including investigative reports, photos, audio recordings, videos, and disciplinary records.
This California law—like so many laws out there—does have exceptions. For example, certain personal information and information that legitimately could endanger someone have to be redacted. Also, an agency holding relevant records can delay disclosure under the right circumstances. An example is delaying disclosure of records relating to an incident involving extreme force by an officer while an investigation of the incident is ongoing.
(Cal. Penal Code § 832.7(b) (2019).)
That there is a process by which to request police personnel records doesn’t mean that defendants automatically get them. In many instances, once a defendant makes a proper request of the personnel records of an officer-witness, the government (whether the prosecution or a different government agency that has the records) must review the files and provide any significant information that helps the defense.
The government typically may lawfully refuse to turn over personnel files if there’s no basis to believe they’re helpful or relevant to the defendant’s case. Fortunately, courts frequently oversee the review process in order to determine whether disclosure of the records would be favorable to the defense.
Consulting a Lawyer
If you want to know whether you have a legitimate chance at obtaining police personnel files, consult an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Your attorney can advise you about the likelihood of getting the records and the procedure involved, both of which depend on your jurisdiction.
Motion in Limine Expert opinion
DEFENDANT MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF — REGARDING CERTAIN OPINIONS ON LIABILITY, CAUSATION, AND DAMAGES
Defendant Motion in Limine
Plaintiff’s witnesses should be ordered to refrain from offering any evidence as to Defendants’ state of mind, and witness and counsel should be ordered not to introduce any evidence and argument that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly, purposefully, heedlessly, recklessly, consciously, callously, without regard to the consequences, or the like.
Defendant’s Proposed Questions for Voire Dire
Defendant’s proposed jury selection questions, for the US District Court for the District of Arizona
Defendant’s Trial Memorandum Re: Necessity
Defendant’s memorandum on the model jury instructions concerning a necessity defense. US District Court for the District of Arizona.
Motion to Unseal Docket Entries in Preparation for Appeal
Defendant seeking to unseal docket entries prior to filing an appeal. US District Court for the District of Arizona
Defendant’s Motion to Designate Case Complex
Criminal defendant’s motion to designate the case as complex, in the US District Court for the District of Arizona
Motion to Continue Trial and Motion to Extend Pre-Trial Motion Deadline (1st Request)
Defendant’s 1st request to continue trial and extend motions deadline, in the US District Court for the District of Arizona. Defense reasons was more time needed to investigate.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine Re: Statements Within Immigration
Immigration Defendant seeking to exclude statements made to ICE and other government agents in prior contacts with ICE and other law enforcement regarding his immigration status (Defendant exercised the 5th in this case). US District Court for the District of Arizona.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine Re: Initial Contact
Defendant in an Immigration case seeking to exclude the reasons for, and facts that, he was in jail when ICE agents made contact with him.