Accident Reconstruction, MIL to preclude
Motion in limine to preclude accident reconstructionist
Speculation about Medical Bill Reductions, Motion in Limine
Motion in limine to preclude speculative testimony that medical bills will be reduced
Hospital writeoff gifts, Motion in limine
Motion in limine regarding Hospital write offs are gifts that are still recoverable as medical specials
Biomechanic opinions re injuries, MIL to exclude
Motion in limine to preclude biomechanicist’s opinion re injuries
Product Liability Lawsuit – Federal Court Civil Complaint and Jury Demand
Federal Court Civil Complaint, including claims for Strict Liability, Product Liability-Failure to Warn, Negligence, Breach of Warranty- Express and Implied, Fraud, Fraudulent Concealment, and Negligent Representation.
Product liability is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products cause.
Product Defects: Responsible Parties
For product liability to arise, at some point the product must have been sold in the marketplace. Historically, a contractual relationship, known as “privity of contract,” had to exist between the person injured by a product and the supplier of the product in order for the injured person to recover. In most states today, however, that requirement no longer exists, and the injured person does not have to be the purchaser of the product in order to recover. Any person who foreseeably could have been injured by a defective product can recover for his or her injuries, as long as the product was sold to someone.
Liability for a product defect could rest with any party in the product’s chain of distribution, such as:
-The product manufacturer;
-A manufacturer of component parts;
-A party that assembles or installs the product;
-The wholesaler; and
-The retail store that sold the product to the consumer.
Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence Pertaining to Impairment Ratings
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PERTAINING TO IMPAIRMENT RATINGS
Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT REGARDING TRAFFIC CITATIONS, DRIVING RECORDS
AND PRIOR UNRELATED TRAFFIC OFFENSES/CHARGES
Federal Civil Complaint under 42 USC 1983 (Excessive Force)
Civil Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 for police use of excessive force. US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Plaintiff’s Response and Objections to Notice to Take the Videotaped Deposition of and Subpoena Duces Tecum
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AND OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE THE VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION aND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
Defendants Company Trial Brief on Improper Argument of Defendant’s ongoing Employment
DEFENDANT COMPANY TRIAL BRIEF ON IMPROPER ARGUMENT OF DEFENDANT’S ONGOING EMPLOYMENT in auto accident case
Plaintiff’s Memorandum Brief in Opposition to Defendant, M.D.’S C.R.M. 7 Petition for Review of Magistrate’s Order
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT , M.D.’S C.R.M. 7 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE’S ORDER
Defendant Company Trial Brief Re: Negligent Entrustment Claim
DEFENDANT COMPANY TRIAL BRIEF RE: NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT CLAIM in auto accident
Defendant’s Initial Rule 26 Disclosures – Personal Injury
A party must make its initial disclosures based on the information then reasonably available to it. In addition to the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), a party must disclose to the other parties the identity of any witness it may use at trial to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 703, or 705. Appendix A to these disclosures identifies those individuals who may have discoverable information relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings.
Response to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude any Evidence of Medical Expense Payments from any Collateral Source
PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OF MEDICAL EXPENSE PAYMENTS FROM ANY COLLATERAL SOURCE
Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine – Medical Malpractice
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE
A. Unopposed Motion in Limine to Preclude any Evidence or Argument Regarding the Alleged Consequences of a Damages Award in This Lawsuit or Any Other Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
B. Unopposed Motion in Limine to Preclude Any Arguments or Inferences That Plaintiff is Bringing Her Claims Simply to Win the Lottery or Otherwise Roll the Dice on Litigation
E. Motion in Limine to Preclude Any Evidence, Testimony, Argument, or Suggestion of Any Alleged Comparative Fault of Plaintiff or Failure to Mitigate Damages by Plaintiff.
A. Motion in Limine to preclude any expert witness from offering opinions or testimony outside the scope of their previously disclosed opinions.