Defendant’s First Set of Discovery Requests – Personal Injury
DEFENDANT’S FIRST SET OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO PERSONAL INJURY CASE
Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for New Trial – Medical Malpractice
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
Plaintiff’s Notice of Errata Relative to her Election to Receive Immediate Payment
PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF ERRATA RELATIVE TO HER ELECTION TO RECEIVE IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF THE PRESENT VALUE OF THE FUTURE DAMAGE AWARD IN A LUMP-SUM AMOUNT IN LIEU OF PERIODIC PAYMENTS
Defendant Trial Brief Regarding Recoverable Damages
DEFENDANT TRIAL BRIEF REGARDING RECOVERABLE DAMAGES
Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law on Economic Damages
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON ECONOMIC DAMAGES
Proposed Stipulated Jury Instructions – Personal Injury
PARTIES’ PROPOSED STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Plaintiff’s Election to Get Immediate Payment for Future Damages
PLAINTIFF’S ELECTION TO RECEIVE IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF THE PRESENT VALUE OF THE FUTURE DAMAGE AWARD IN A LUMP-SUM AMOUNT IN LIEU OF PERIODIC PAYMENTS
Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Standard of Care Opinions
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE STANDARD OF CARE OPINIONS BY —, PURSUANT TO C.R.E. 702
Plaintiff’s Brief on Comparative Negligence – Personal Injury
Comparative negligence is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to cause the injury.
Comparative negligence states that when an accident occurs, the fault and or negligence of each party involved is based upon their respective contributions to the accident. This allows insurers to assign blame and pay claims accordingly.
Defendant’s Offer of Settlement – Personal Injury
DEFENDANT’S OFFER OF SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO §13-17-202, C.R.S.
Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Summary Judgment
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO ACCEPT PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND OUTRAGEOUS CONDUCT CLAIM
Complaint for Negligence Against Ski Area
The four elements that a plaintiff must prove to win a negligence suit are 1) Duty, 2) Breach, 3) Cause, and 4) Harm. Generally speaking, when someone acts in a careless way and causes an injury to another person, under the legal principle of “negligence” the careless person will be legally liable for any resulting harm. Ski Resort Immunity and Inherent Risk of Skiing protects the ski resort from most claims of negligence – which usually must be proved to win a personal injury lawsuit.
Plaintiff’s Proposed Jury Instructions – Personal Injury
PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Plaintiff Submit Jury Instruction with Cite – Personal Injury
Plaintiff submit jury instruction with cite