Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
OPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND WAIVER OF APPEAL BOND
OPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND WAIVER OF APPEAL BOND
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED CODE VIOLATIONS DISCOVERED AFTER AUGUST 2013
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED CODE VIOLATIONS DISCOVERED AFTER AUGUST 2013
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF AFTER DISCOVERY CUT-OFF
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF AFTER DISCOVERY CUT-OFF
Answer to Title VII Complaint
Defendants answer to complaint for title VII
Complaint for Age Discrimination
Age discrimination involves treating an applicant or employee less favorably because of his or her age.
Complaint in Federal court for age discrimination:
To establish an age discrimination claim, plaintiff must show that:
–she was older than 40;
–she was discharged;
–she was qualified for the job and met the defendant’s legitimate expectations; and.
–her position remained open or was filled by a similarly qualified individual who was substantially younger.
An average out of court settlement is about $40,000. In addition, 10 percent of wrongful termination and discrimination cases result in a $1 million dollar settlement. The majority of cases, about 67 percent, are ruled in the plaintiff’s favor when taken to litigation.
What are grounds for age discrimination?
The employee, at the time of the act alleged to be discriminatory, is 40 or older; The employee is qualified for their job position; The employee experiences an adverse employment action; Adverse actions include actions such as demotions, firings, or changes to the terms, conditions or privileges of employment); and.
Complaint for Injunctive Relief & Damages Discrimination
RETALIATORY DISCHARGE IN VIOLATION OF THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT, WRONGFUL TERMINATION BASED ON DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION, FAILURE TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION
Complaint for Gender Discrimination
Complaint for Gender Discrimination
Civil Rights Complaint – Sex Discrimination & Retaliation
Complaint for Disability Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Retaliation
Civil Complaint for Damages, Declaratory Relief, Extraordinary Writs, and Preliminary Injunction
Federal Civil Rights Complaint (42 USC 1983), including requests for damages, injunction, extraordinary writs, and declaratory relief out of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Declaratory relief refers to a judgment of a court which determines the rights of parties without ordering anything be done or awarding damages. By seeking a declaratory judgment, the party making the request is seeking for an official declaration of the status of a matter in controversy.
The declaratory judgment is generally considered a statutory remedy and not an equitable remedy in the United States, and is thus not subject to equitable requirements, though there are analogies that can be found in the remedies granted by courts of equity.
Declaratory relief refers to a judgment of a court which determines the rights of parties without ordering anything be done or awarding damages. By seeking a declaratory judgment, the party making the request is seeking for an official declaration of the status of a matter in controversy.
Federal Civil Complaint under 42 USC 1983 (Excessive Force)
Civil Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 for police use of excessive force. US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Introduce Summaries into Evidence at Trial
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO INTRODUCE SUMMARIES INTO EVIDENCE AT TRIAL
Plaintiff’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on Back Pay
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON BACK PAY after receiving a judgment on title VII case
Excessive Force Complain
Excessive force complaint and malicious prosecution against City and Transit authority