Defendant’s Notice of Expert Testimony
Defendant’s Notice of Expert Testimony
Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion to Exclude Certain Non-Scientific Opinions of Plaintiff’s Expert
Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion to Exclude Certain Non-Scientific Opinions of Plaintiff’s Expert
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony
DEFENDANT’S FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME VALUATIONS
Defendant’s fifth motion in limine regarding valuations performed by a person that is an expert witness for plaintiff.Â
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT
DEFENDANT NOTICE OF JOINDER IN DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
Defendant’s motion to ask the court to prevent plaintiff’s from introducing the testimony from their expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.Â
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S ORDER RE: DEPOSITION
Defendant’s requests the court to reconsider objections which were upheld by Division 3 in their review of the deposition of expert.Â
DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME
Defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding the testimony of expert witness.Â
Defendants Motion for Extension of Discovery for Injury Claim and to Designate Experts
Defendants Motion for Extension of Discovery for Injury Claim and to Designate Experts
Defendants’ Motion to Spike Plaintiff’s Expert’s Testimony and Report Pursuant to Law – Cival Law Legal Document
Motion to spike plaintiffs expert testimony on basis the testimony is not based on reliable scientific facts or reliable resources.
DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE TESTIMONY
DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE TESTIMONY
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE TESTIMONY
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE TESTIMONY
Defense Counsel Closing Statements in Sex Assault – SVU Case
For defense counsel, closing argument is the last chance to remind the jury of the prosecution’s high burden of proof and to persuade the jury that there is, at a minimum, reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s guilt.Client was facing 5 counts of sexual assault by two different children. The trial was a three weeks trial. Prosecution had five experts and 9 witnesses. The jury deliberated for 3.5 days and ended with a hung jury. According to a juror they were locked at 10-2 not guilty.