-
×
Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to State's Motion in Limine for a Preliminary Ruling on the Use of Prior Testimony
- Vendor:
Jeffrey Jensen
Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to State's Motion in Limine for a Preliminary Ruling on the Use of Prior Testimony Subtotal: $25.00
“Defendant’s Memorandum in Opposition to State’s Motion in Limine for a Preliminary Ruling on the Use of Prior Testimony” has been added to your cart. Continue shopping
Defendant’s Notice of Expert Testimony
Sold By :
Lawyers Help Lawyers
Defendant’s Notice of Expert Testimony
$20.00
Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion to Exclude Certain Non-Scientific Opinions of Plaintiff’s Expert
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion to Exclude Certain Non-Scientific Opinions of Plaintiff’s Expert
$35.00
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony
$35.00
DEFENDANT’S FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME VALUATIONS
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Defendant’s fifth motion in limine regarding valuations performed by a person that is an expert witness for plaintiff.Â
$50.00
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT
Sold By :
Lawyers Help Lawyers
DEFENDANT NOTICE OF JOINDER IN DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT
$50.00
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Defendant’s motion to ask the court to prevent plaintiff’s from introducing the testimony from their expert witness.Â
$35.00
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.Â
$35.00
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.
$35.00
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT’S ORDER RE: DEPOSITION
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Defendant’s requests the court to reconsider objections which were upheld by Division 3 in their review of the deposition of expert.Â
$35.00
DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding the testimony of expert witness.Â
$50.00
Defendants Motion for Extension of Discovery for Injury Claim and to Designate Experts
Sold By :
Lorraine Evans
Defendants Motion for Extension of Discovery for Injury Claim and to Designate Experts
$19.99
Defendants’ Motion to Spike Plaintiff’s Expert’s Testimony and Report Pursuant to Law – Cival Law Legal Document
Sold By :
Anderson Hemmat
Motion to spike plaintiffs expert testimony on basis the testimony is not based on reliable scientific facts or reliable resources.
$50.00
DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE TESTIMONY
Sold By :
Lawyers Help Lawyers
DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE TESTIMONY
$20.00
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE TESTIMONY
Sold By :
Lawyers Help Lawyers
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT AND OTHER INAPPROPRIATE TESTIMONY
$50.00
Defense Counsel Closing Statements in Sex Assault – SVU Case
Sold By :
Hometown Legal Team
For defense counsel, closing argument is the last chance to remind the jury of the prosecution’s high burden of proof and to persuade the jury that there is, at a minimum, reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s guilt.Client was facing 5 counts of sexual assault by two different children. The trial was a three weeks trial. Prosecution had five experts and 9 witnesses. The jury deliberated for 3.5 days and ended with a hung jury. According to a juror they were locked at 10-2 not guilty.
$7.49