Litigation
Showing 151–165 of 655 resultsSorted by price: high to low
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Unopposed Motion In Limine to Preclude Testimony Regarding Insurance Coverage
UNOPPOSED MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ TESTIMONY REGARDING INSURANCE COVERAGE
Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Entry of Judgment, Costs & Attorney Fees
PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES (WITH BILL OF COSTS)
Motion to Strike Reply
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S (sic) RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE RE UNDISCLOSED EXPERT OPINIONS
Motion in Limine RE: Injuries and Medical Treatment
MOTION IN LIMINE RE: INJURIES AND MEDICAL TREATMENT
Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
Motion For Sanction
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO ATTEND DEPOSITIO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
Civil DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR FINDING THAT OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY SPOILED EVIDENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR FINDING THAT OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY SPOILED EVIDENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ADVERSE INFERENCE INSTRUCTION
Motion to leave intervene in Wrongful Death Case
Petition to intervene in a wrongful death case
Motion to Vacat final Pretrial Conference
JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO VACATE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR APPEARANCE BY TELEPHONE
Motion to Appear by Telephone
MOTION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY FOR THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SET FOR
Motion to continue motions hearing
A simple motion to continue motion hearing
Motion for Expedited Telephone Hearing: Spoliation & Destructive Testing
MOTION FOR EXPEDITED TELEPHONE HEARING RE: SPOLIATION AND DESTRUCTIVE TESTING
Motion to Dismiss – Civil Litigation
Plaintiffs’ claims for fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation fail because the Defendants did not know of the allegedly misrepresented conditions. Furthermore, Plaintiffs were not justified in relying upon the representations made by the defendants. To the extent the purported defects existed at the time of contracting, they were open and obvious and could have been detected through reasonable diligence. Plaintiff’s breach of contract claim fails because there is no genuine dispute that the defendants did not have actual knowledge of the presence of bats under the roof tiles on the house. Accordingly, they did not breach a contractual duty owed to Plaintiffs as prescribed by the Seller’s Property Disclosure form. Plaintiffs’ claim for civil conspiracy likewise fails because the defendants have not committed an unlawful act.
Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Respond to Complaint
A motion for extension of time to file and answer or respond to complaint in a civil action, with a proposed order