Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Defendants’ Designated Experts Pursuant to C.R.E. 702
Defendant’s motion for an Order excluding at the trial of this matter the testimony of four purported experts proffered by Defendants
Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Defendants’ Experts
Plaintiff’s motion to limit the testimony of four of the defendants’ experts.
Defendants’ Combined Motions in Limine
Defendants motion to exclude from trial testimony and evidence of (1) expiration of the statute of limitations against; (2) Defendants’ budget, profit, and bonus policies; (3) irrelevant previous crimes; (4) Defendants’ firearm policy; (5) subsequent remedial measures; (6) Defendants’ alleged failure to produce evidence; (7) Plaintiffs’ injuries; (8) insurance coverage; and (9) placing the jury into the Plaintiffs’ position.
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2]
|
DEFENSE REQUEST FOR IN-PERSON TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO U.S. CONST. AMEND. VI AND C.R.S. §16-3-309(5) REGARDING TESTING AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY [DEF – 2] |
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIFTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING MILLER VALUATIONS
Defendant’s motion to ask the court to prevent plaintiff’s from introducing the testimony from their expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PEV AND RESERVE INFORMATION
Defendant’s reply in support of second motion regarding the prevention of plaintiff from introducing evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the pure exposure value (PEV) or reserve information for the expert witness.
DEFENDANT’S SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAME
Defendant’s sixth motion in limine regarding the testimony of expert witness.
Motion to Reconsider and Reopen Record
Motion to Reopen Immigration Court testimony based upon Respondent’s incompetency. Respondent became confused during testimony due to a traumatic brain injury which caused serious cognitive defects and memory and confusion issues. Motion requested that Court reopen the record and take additional testimony of Respondent’s lack of competence.
DEFENDANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SIXTH MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING NAMES
Defendant’s reply in support of their sixth motion regarding the testimony of the expert. This motion asks the court to prevent plaintiffs from introducing evidence, testimony, or opinion from the Judge.
Motion for Disclosure of Expert Witnesses – Criminal Defense
Disclose expert witnesses to minimize risk that opinions and testimony are excluded.
Rule 16 is revised to give greater discovery to both the prosecution and the defense. Subdivision (a) deals with disclosure of evidence by the government. … The draft provides for a right of prosecution discovery independent of any prior request for discovery by the defendant.
The name “Shreck Motion” comes from a Colorado Supreme Court case, State v. … 2001), in which the Court formulated and set forth standards for determining admissibility of evidence and expert witness’ testimony that became the basis for their opinion in the case.
Experts Live Testimony – Criminal Defense Legal Document
Document requesting those involved in finding criminalistics in a case to testify in court.
Experts Live Testimony – Criminal Defense Legal Document
Document requesting those involved in finding criminalistics in a case to testify in court.
Defendants’ Motion to Spike Plaintiff’s Expert’s Testimony and Report Pursuant to Law – Cival Law Legal Document
Motion to spike plaintiffs expert testimony on basis the testimony is not based on reliable scientific facts or reliable resources.
Objection to Proposed Expert Testimony, Motions for Expert Discovery and for a Shreck Hearing Related to Client’s Proposed Expert Testimony – Criminal Defense Legal Document
Objection to proposed expert testimony on basis testimony is unreliable and should not be helpful to a jury.
Notice Regarding In-Person Testimony Relating to Laboratory Analysis and Other Scientific Testing
Document entails information stating any employee or technician to review evidence that can be introduced in trial must testify as well. – Criminal Defense Legal Document