Legal Document Shop
Showing 1891–1905 of 5171 resultsSorted by popularity
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Motion for 404B Notice
the motion requests that the Court Order the prosecution to provide notice in advance of trial that conforms to the standards set forth in People v. Spoto. Further, if the prosecution seeks to introduce such evidence, the Defendant moves that a hearing on the admissibility of such evidence be held sufficiently in advance of trial in order to afford counsel adequate time to confront the proffered evidence.
MOTION FOR OUT-OF-STATE WITNESS TO APPEAR BY PHONE
MOTION FOR OUT-OF-STATE WITNESS TO APPEAR BY PHONE
MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY: DUI Case
MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY: TROOPER EVIDENTIAL BREATH ALCOHOL TEST (EBAT) OPERATOR
CERTIFICATION
MOTION TO SUPPRESS BREATH TEST RESULT DUE TO FRAUDULENT CERTIFICATION
MOTION TO SUPPRESS BREATH TEST RESULT DUE TO FRAUDULENT CERTIFICATION
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THE ADMISSIBILITY OF DEFENDANT’S PRIVATE PORTABLE BREATH TEST RESULT
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF THE ADMISSIBILITY OF DEFENDANT’S PRIVATE PORTABLE BREATH TEST RESULT
MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY: EVIDENTIAL BREATH ALCOHOL TEST (EBAT) OPERATOR CERTIFICATIONS AND DISPATCH TAPE
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ILLEGAL STOP, INVOLUNTARY ROADSIDE TESTS, WARRANTLESS ARREST, STATEMENTS AND INVOLUNTARY BREATH TEST
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ILLEGAL STOP, INVOLUNTARY ROADSIDE TESTS, WARRANTLESS ARREST, STATEMENTS AND INVOLUNTARY BREATH TEST
Motion for Sanction and/or to dismiss for destruction of evidence
A motion filed in this case, when it was determined by the defense team that a video surveillance was not obtained by the investigators or DA until it was to late. The judge denied the motion in part but allowed defense to use the lack of obtaining the evidence in their case.
Preview the legal document below:
Order Re: Family Partnership
Great decision handed down by Denver District Court judge Regarding a claim a son made against his father for his share of real estate. Son/ Plaintiff claimed there was a family partnership that owned real estate, Father/Defendant denied a partnership and claimed he owned all the real estate separate. Judge agered that there was no partnership
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ NONPARTY DESIGNATIONS
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ NONPARTY DESIGNATIONS
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT
CONTESTED MOTION TO POSTPONE TRIAL
CONTESTED MOTION TO POSTPONE TRIAL
MOTION IN LIMINE RE: COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL
MOTION IN LIMINE RE: COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL
MOTION IN LIMINE RE: APPRAISAL TESTIMONY
MOTION IN LIMINE RE: APPRAISAL TESTIMONY