Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Defendant’s Motion for the Production of Evidence from the Government’s DNA Expert
Defendant’s Motion for the Production of Evidence from the Government’s DNA Expert
Defendant’s Motion for Voluntary Surrender
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY SURRENDER
Defendant’s Motion in Limine
Federal criminal motion in limine, where defendant seeks to exclude out of court statements, news reports, GAO office reports and other items. US District Court for the District of Colorado.
Defendant’s Motion in Limine – Civil Litigation
I. Plaintiffs should be precluded from eliciting opinion testimony from Defendant’s employee, NAME, CNA.
II. Plaintiff should be precluded from referring to “never events.”
III. Plaintiffs should be precluded from making “negligence in the air” arguments.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine Re: Initial Contact
Defendant in an Immigration case seeking to exclude the reasons for, and facts that, he was in jail when ICE agents made contact with him.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine Re: Statements Within Immigration
Immigration Defendant seeking to exclude statements made to ICE and other government agents in prior contacts with ICE and other law enforcement regarding his immigration status (Defendant exercised the 5th in this case). US District Court for the District of Arizona.
Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence of Other and Subsequent Acts
Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence of Other and Subsequent Acts
Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Medical Board Investigation
Defendant’s Motion in Limine Regarding Medical Board Investigation
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF PRIOR CLAIMS AND BOARD MATTERS
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF PRIOR CLAIMS AND BOARD MATTERS
Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Improper Opinion Testimony
Defendant’s Motion in Limine to exclude specific improper opinion testimony. Filed in the US istrict Court for the Western District of California, the motion, with exhibits, seeks to exclude improperly disclosed (or undisclosed) and otherwise impermissible opinion testimony under Rule 16(G).
Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Preclude Evidence of Uncharged Tax Years
Motion by a criminal defendant in the US District Court for the Western District of California to preclude the inclusion of specific evidence. In this case, to exclude evidence of tax filings for ax years not included in the Government’s charges.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404
DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 401, 402, 403, and 404
Defendant’s Motion In Limmne to Exclude Any & All Evidence That Was Not Properly Disclosed
Civil case where opposing party did not properly disclose witnesses and exhibits prior to jury trial.
Defendant’s Motion on Stipulated Proposed Order on Speedy Trial
Defendant’s Motion on Stipulated Proposed Order on Speedy Trial