Legal Document Shop
Showing 3661–3675 of 5171 resultsSorted by average rating
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Modify Bond Terms
Unopposed Motion to Modify Bond Conditions previously set by the Court. Specifically, to modify/correct the name of a surety on the bond.
Defendant’s Notice and Motion to Dismiss Counts One and Two
Defendant’s Notice and Motion to Dismiss two specific Counts in a federal criminal prosecution, on Constitutional Grounds. For the US District Court for the Western District of California.
Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Improper Opinion Testimony
Defendant’s Motion in Limine to exclude specific improper opinion testimony. Filed in the US istrict Court for the Western District of California, the motion, with exhibits, seeks to exclude improperly disclosed (or undisclosed) and otherwise impermissible opinion testimony under Rule 16(G).
Defendant’s Motion In Limine to Preclude Evidence of Uncharged Tax Years
Motion by a criminal defendant in the US District Court for the Western District of California to preclude the inclusion of specific evidence. In this case, to exclude evidence of tax filings for ax years not included in the Government’s charges.
Brief in Support of Bond and Pre-Trial Release by Defendant
Brief in Support of a motion to release a criminal defendant to Bond and Pre-Trial Release. Federal District Court for the Western District of California.
Plaintiff’s Response and Objections to Notice to Take the Videotaped Deposition of and Subpoena Duces Tecum
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AND OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE TO TAKE THE VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION aND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
Defendants Company Trial Brief on Improper Argument of Defendant’s ongoing Employment
DEFENDANT COMPANY TRIAL BRIEF ON IMPROPER ARGUMENT OF DEFENDANT’S ONGOING EMPLOYMENT in auto accident case
Plaintiff’s Memorandum Brief in Opposition to Defendant, M.D.’S C.R.M. 7 Petition for Review of Magistrate’s Order
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT , M.D.’S C.R.M. 7 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE’S ORDER
Defendant Company Trial Brief Re: Negligent Entrustment Claim
DEFENDANT COMPANY TRIAL BRIEF RE: NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT CLAIM in auto accident
Defendant C.R.M. 7 Petition for Review of Magistrate’s Order
DEFENDANT C.R.M. 7 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE’S ORDER
Defendant’s Initial Rule 26 Disclosures – Personal Injury
A party must make its initial disclosures based on the information then reasonably available to it. In addition to the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), a party must disclose to the other parties the identity of any witness it may use at trial to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 703, or 705. Appendix A to these disclosures identifies those individuals who may have discoverable information relevant to disputed facts alleged with particularity in the pleadings.
Motion to Preclude Client from Introducing Evidence or Testimony – Plaintiff was not Informed of Her Right to Undergo Testing
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFF FROM ARGUING, OR INTRODUCING EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY, THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT INFORMED OF HER RIGHT ON AUGUST 1, 2012, TO UNDERGO TESTING TO DEFINITIVELY RULE OUT THE POSSIBILITY OF INFECTION
Response to Defendant’s Motion to Prohibit Plaintiff from Asking Any Medical Expert Whether the Conduct of Physicians, was “Foreseeable”
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PROHIBIT PLAINTIFF FROM ASKING ANY MEDICAL EXPERT WHETHER THE CONDUCT OF , OR OTHER UCH PHYSICIANS, WAS “FORESEEABLE
Defendant’s Motion for Leaving to Conduct Ex Parte Meetings with some of Plaintiff’s Treating Health Care Providers
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT EX PARTE MEETINGS WITH SOME OF PLAINTIFF’S TREATING HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS
Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Standard of Care Opinions by Name, M.D. Pusuant to C.R.E. 702
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE STANDARD OF CARE OPINIONS BY NAME, M.D. PURSUANT TO C.R.E. 702