Whether or not the exclusionary rule applies in driver’s license revocation proceedings, the express consent statute does not allow the Department of Revenue to revoke a driver’s license pursuant to section 42-2-126 on the basis of a search that itself is the product of an illegal stop and arrest. In this case we argued that, The court of appeals erred in holding that a driver cannot rely on the exclusionary rule to raise the illegality of initial police contact as a defense in a driver’s license revocation proceeding conducted pursuant to section Colorado Law,
Note statute has changed this since the appeal.
This is a state of Wisconsin, Court of Appeals, District II, defendant’s petition for leave to appeal a non-final order and memorandum in support of defendant’s petition for leave to appeal non-final order. This was used in a case alleging felony voter fraud. The appeal was done in regards to jury instruction prior to deliberation.
Appellant’s opening brief concerning the case where the appellant is charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, careless driving, resisting arrest and obstruction of police.
An Appeal to Supreme Court Petitioner, PETITIONER’S NAME, asks this Court to determine an important and unresolved question concerning ex parte meetings with a plaintiff’s treating physicians pursuant to
After the appellant serves its notice designating the record, you have 10 days to tell the Superior Court what additional documents or exhibits you want in the record that will be sent to the Court of Appeal. Limited civil case — A general civil case that involves an amount of money of $25,000 or less.