Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Complaint for Age Discrimination
Age discrimination involves treating an applicant or employee less favorably because of his or her age.
Complaint in Federal court for age discrimination:
To establish an age discrimination claim, plaintiff must show that:
–she was older than 40;
–she was discharged;
–she was qualified for the job and met the defendant’s legitimate expectations; and.
–her position remained open or was filled by a similarly qualified individual who was substantially younger.
An average out of court settlement is about $40,000. In addition, 10 percent of wrongful termination and discrimination cases result in a $1 million dollar settlement. The majority of cases, about 67 percent, are ruled in the plaintiff’s favor when taken to litigation.
What are grounds for age discrimination?
The employee, at the time of the act alleged to be discriminatory, is 40 or older; The employee is qualified for their job position; The employee experiences an adverse employment action; Adverse actions include actions such as demotions, firings, or changes to the terms, conditions or privileges of employment); and.
Complaint for Breach of Contract – Insurance Law
Complaint filed in Federal District court based on diversity. Complaint is for breach of insurance contract and includes, deceptive trade practice, unjust enrichment.
Complaint for breach of Contract and Colorado Construction claim
Included in package is complaint, summons and civil cover sheet. Complaint includes breach of contract, Quantum Meruit and/or Unjust Enrichment and Violation of C.R.S. § 38-22-127 (requesting treble damages)
Complaint for Civil Theft
Complaint against company for civil theft and fraud
Complaint for Damages, Certificate of Review and Jury Demand
Complaint for Damages, Certificate of Review and Jury Demand
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, DECLARATORY RELIEF, EXTRAORDINATY WRITS, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging the constitutionality of the action of Defendants DEFENDANT’S NAME surrounding the revocation of Plaintiff’s duty-disability retirement on April 28, 2016, specifically the denial of procedural due process to Plaintiff through the withholding of medical reports and other documents upon which they relied in their review and denial of a hearing before an impartial decision maker.
Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Request for Jorgensen Hearing – Civil Law Legal Document
Complaint to have judgment of Court to determine the specific rights of parties without ordering punishments or rewards.
Complaint for Employment Benefits
COMPLAINT FOR BENEFITS UNDER AN EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Complaint For ERISA
Filed this complaint for ERISA benefits from a denial of long term benefits
Complaint for Excessive Force
Complaint Excessive force for an off duty police officer working for a bar
Complaint for Fair Debt Act
A lawsuit Filed for Violation For Federal Fair Debt Act
Complaint for Fair Labor Standard Act
Complaint under the fair labor standard act for failure to pay overtime and retaliation
Complaint for Fair Labor Standard Act – Ohio
1. the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act, O.R.C. Chapter 4111 (“the Ohio Wage Act”), the Ohio Prompt Pay Act, O.R.C. § 4113.15 (“OPPA”), and 28 U.S.C. §1331.
Complaint for Fair Labor Standard Act & Violation of Minimum Wage Act
Defendant Restaurant failed to pay appropriate wage and we sued on behalf of waiter. Colo. Rev. Stat § 8-6-101, et seq.