-
×
Federal Civil Complaint under 42 USC 1983 (Excessive Force)
- Vendor:
Graham Legal Services
Federal Civil Complaint under 42 USC 1983 (Excessive Force) Subtotal: $20.00
Return of Service – Family Law Legal Document
Sold By :
Graham Legal Services
Written document acknowledging by a process server stating that there was a service of legal documents, like a summons and complaint.
$20.00
Summons for Dissolution of Marriage – Family Law Legal Document
Sold By :
Graham Legal Services
Summons for Dissolution of Marriage, or also known as a petition for divorce.
$20.00
Petition for Parental Responsibilities and Summons
Sold By :
Leonard Martinez
Basic Colorado Petition for Allocation of Parental Responsibilities
$25.00
Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction
Sold By :
Joe Martinez
COMES NOW, Martinez Law Firm, LLC, behalf of Defendant, Marisa Aranda, and hereby submits this Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by stating as follows:
1. On January 5, 2015, Defendant, Marisa Aranda was issued a Uniform Summons and Complaint or Penalty Assessment alleging driving under the influence, DUI per se, failure to present insurance and failure to obey a traffic signal. See attached Exhibit 1. In the Summons the officer states the offenses as alleged occurred in Arapahoe County, CO. The Colorado State Patrol Case Report also states the alleged offenses occurred in Arapahoe County, See attached Exhibit 2.
$40.00
Motion for Contempt in Divorce Proceedings
Sold By :
Hometown Legal Team
Motion for contempt for failure to follow court order on divorce, with show cause order and alias summons
$40.00
Motion for Contempt Family Law
Sold By :
Chavez Law
Filing a Motion for Contempt might cause the other party to file a motion to change the court order. After a divorce decree was entered, one party failed to follow the court order, a contempt was filed and an alias summons was also issued. In family law, a finding of contempt is a way for the Court to enforce child support, spousal support, custody and visitation orders that a party has violated.
$40.00
Motion to Quash Service Pursuant–Landlord and Tenant
Sold By :
Criminal Defense Expert
A Motion to Quash Service in a FED (Eviction) case, where Plaintiff failed to follow Rule 304 regarding proper service of a Complaint and Summons. While it may seem so, the Defendants were not married, nor were they otherwise related. As the Rule requires service in this instance separately on each, even had Plaintiff properly served one tenant, he did not properly serve the other.
$40.00