Description
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE AS TO PLAINTIFF’S DISPUTE OF THE UNDERLYING DEBT
( ! ) Warning: Undefined array key "final" in /var/www/vhosts/attorneydocs.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/kapee-child/functions.php on line 297 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Call Stack | ||||
# | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
1 | 0.0971 | 6009448 | {main}( ) | .../index.php:0 |
2 | 0.0971 | 6009800 | require( '/var/www/vhosts/attorneydocs.com/httpdocs/wp-blog-header.php ) | .../index.php:17 |
3 | 0.0972 | 6011496 | require_once( '/var/www/vhosts/attorneydocs.com/httpdocs/wp-load.php ) | .../wp-blog-header.php:13 |
4 | 0.0972 | 6011936 | require_once( '/var/www/vhosts/attorneydocs.com/httpdocs/wp-config.php ) | .../wp-load.php:50 |
5 | 0.0972 | 6013688 | require_once( '/var/www/vhosts/attorneydocs.com/httpdocs/wp-settings.php ) | .../wp-config.php:101 |
6 | 1.1737 | 49807344 | do_action( $hook_name = 'wp_loaded' ) | .../wp-settings.php:749 |
7 | 1.1737 | 49807560 | WP_Hook->do_action( $args = [0 => ''] ) | .../plugin.php:517 |
8 | 1.1737 | 49807560 | WP_Hook->apply_filters( $value = '', $args = [0 => ''] ) | .../class-wp-hook.php:348 |
9 | 1.2004 | 50413152 | WC_Form_Handler::add_to_cart_action( $url = '' ) | .../class-wp-hook.php:324 |
10 | 1.2019 | 50422984 | WC_Form_Handler::add_to_cart_handler_simple( $product_id = 23007 ) | .../class-wc-form-handler.php:843 |
11 | 1.2039 | 50428112 | WC_Cart->add_to_cart( $product_id = 23007, $quantity = 1, $variation_id = ???, $variation = ???, $cart_item_data = ??? ) | .../class-wc-form-handler.php:871 |
12 | 1.2055 | 50436368 | apply_filters( $hook_name = 'woocommerce_add_cart_item_data', $value = [], ...$args = variadic(23007, 0, 1) ) | .../class-wc-cart.php:1176 |
13 | 1.2055 | 50436616 | WP_Hook->apply_filters( $value = [], $args = [0 => [], 1 => 23007, 2 => 0, 3 => 1] ) | .../plugin.php:205 |
14 | 1.2072 | 50437264 | kj_add_custom_pdf_to_cart( $cart_item_data = [], $product_id = 23007, $variation_id = 0 ) | .../class-wp-hook.php:326 |
$50.00
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE AS TO PLAINTIFF’S DISPUTE OF THE UNDERLYING DEBT