Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Unopposed Motion to Continue Jury Trial
A sample of an unopposed motion to continue jury trial. A well written unopposed motion by the defense counsel to continue the scheduled jury trial which is without objection from the People.
Motion to Suppress Unconstitutionally Obtained Convictions
Sample of a Motion to suppress unconstitutionally obtained convictions. A well written motion to suppress convictions based on the convictions being obtained without counsel.
Defense Objection to People’s Motion to Continue Jury Trial
Sample of the Defense objection to people’s motion to continue jury trial. A well written defense objection based on a witness’s unavailability and the People not providing further information to support their motion to continue.
Motion in Limine to Preclude the Prosecution’s Proposed Expert Testimony
Sample of a motion to preclude the prosecution’s proposed expert testimony. A well written motion to object against the prosecution’s expert witness’s testimony.
The Complete Paul Manafort Indictment
Free Copy of Paul Manafort Indictment
The complete indictment filed in Federal court regarding the Trump campaign’s ties to Russian interests – Download the full legal document for free
Notice of Objection for Notice of any Evidence of Prior Crimes that the Prosecution Intends to Introduce
Sample of a notice of objection for the prosecution to introduce the defendants previous crimes, wrongs, or acts at trial. Well written notice of objection for the prosecution.
Motion to Suppress Defendants Statement during Custodial Interrogation
Sample to suppress Defendant’s statements while in custody without proper Miranda advisement. Well written motion to exclude evidence from an unlawful interrogation
A Colorado Supreme Court order dealing with the exclusionary rule and driver license DMV
The Department of Revenue, through the Division of Motor Vehicles, revoked a driver’s license, following a hearing officer’s determination that the driver had driven a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content in excess of the statutory maximum. The district court reversed, holding that the initial stop of the driver’s vehicle was not supported by reasonable suspicion. The court of appeals reversed the district court and held that the legality of the initial contact between the police and the driver was not relevant in the civil administrative proceeding to revoke the driver’s license. The court also held that the exclusionary rule did not apply to suppress evidence of the driver’s BAC. The supreme court holds that, under section 42-2-126, C.R.S. (2011), “probable cause” in the context of the driver’s license revocation statute, as it existed at the time of the hearing in this case, refers to the quantum and quality of evidence necessary for a law enforcement officer to issue a notice of driver’s license revocation, not whether the officer’s initial contact with the driver was lawful. The supreme court further holds that the exclusionary rule did not apply to suppress evidence of the driver’s BAC in the driver’s license revocation proceeding. Accordingly, the supreme court affirms the judgment of the court of appeals.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35(b
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35(b)
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONVERT DEFERRED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE TO UNSUPERVISED DEFERRED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONVERT DEFERRED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE TO UNSUPERVISED DEFERRED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PERMIT ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF OUT OF STATE TRAVEL FOR EXCHANGE OF CHILDREN FOR PARENTING TIME
UNOPPOSED MOTION
TO PERMIT ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF OUT OF STATE TRAVEL FOR EXCHANGE OF CHILDREN FOR PARENTING TIME
The Court had previously granted a client on bond time to travel out of state, this motion was filed to ask court for extended time to exchange the children for parenting time.
Motion for 404B Notice
the motion requests that the Court Order the prosecution to provide notice in advance of trial that conforms to the standards set forth in People v. Spoto. Further, if the prosecution seeks to introduce such evidence, the Defendant moves that a hearing on the admissibility of such evidence be held sufficiently in advance of trial in order to afford counsel adequate time to confront the proffered evidence.
Appellant Brief on Whether an Illegal Stop Can Affect a License Revocation
Whether or not the exclusionary rule applies in driver’s license revocation proceedings, the express consent statute does not allow the Department of Revenue to revoke a driver’s license pursuant to section 42-2-126 on the basis of a search that itself is the product of an illegal stop and arrest. In this case we argued that, The court of appeals erred in holding that a driver cannot rely on the exclusionary rule to raise the illegality of initial police contact as a defense in a driver’s license revocation proceeding conducted pursuant to section Colorado Law,
Note statute has changed this since the appeal.
Entry of Appearance , Request for Discovery and Request to Reset Pretrial Conference
Firm was retained a day before the pretrial conference, we filed an entry of Appearance and Request for Discovery and Request to Reset the Pretrial Conference
MOTION FOR OUT-OF-STATE WITNESS TO APPEAR BY PHONE
MOTION FOR OUT-OF-STATE WITNESS TO APPEAR BY PHONE