Motion in Support of Necessity of Taint Hearing, Response to State’s Objection – SVU Case

$20.00

In Stock

Motion in support of the previously filed “motion for a pretrial taint hearing” to determine whether the statements and testimony of the child sex abuse witness must be excluded if improper questioning has irremediably compromised the reliability and trustworthiness of that testimonial evidence.

Spyglass

Description

Motion in support of the previously filed “motion for a pretrial taint hearing” to determine whether the statements and testimony of the child sex abuse witness must be excluded if improper questioning has irremediably compromised the reliability and trustworthiness of that testimonial evidence.

  • yes

Related Products

Scroll To Top
Close
Close

Login

Register


Close

My Cart

No products in the cart.