Legal Document Shop
Showing 1651–1665 of 5171 resultsSorted by average rating
Filter by: FEDERAL DISTRICT
Filter by Price
Filter by: FILE TYPE
Confidentiality Agreement for Employees/Consultants of Art Advisory Services
This Confidentiality Agreement is for employees or consultants who provide art advisory and consultation services. It contains provisions that are specific to the fine art world and has tailored provisions for “family” like employers who may have unique confidentiality requirements relative to a large organization.
Website and Related Assets Purchase Agreement
This Website Purchase Agreement covers all of the critical points of a transaction including:
-Related Assets included in the sale (e.g. IP, Brand, Records, Third Party Agreements, Domains, Social Media)
-Payment provisions
-Pre and Post – Closing Obligations
-IP assignment
-Warranties
-Reciprocal indemnification provisions
-A non-compete clause
Motion to Suppress Defendants Statement during Custodial Interrogation
Sample to suppress Defendant’s statements while in custody without proper Miranda advisement. Well written motion to exclude evidence from an unlawful interrogation
Sample Franchise Agreement
A sample franchise agreement. A draft sample franchise agreement used for businesses that want to franchise their business out, or to be used by people looking to buy a franchise.
Guide To Colorado Unemployment Benefits
A Employee and Employer Guide to Colorado Unemployment benefits, What to expect, how to apply for unemployment benefits, Do you qualify? If you are denied, How to appeal.
Amended answer to PI lawsuit
Amended answer for a auto accident case, whereas the manufacturer was sued for defective vehicle. Sample answers including not doing business in state of Colorado, other affirmative defenses.
A Colorado Supreme Court order dealing with the exclusionary rule and driver license DMV
The Department of Revenue, through the Division of Motor Vehicles, revoked a driver’s license, following a hearing officer’s determination that the driver had driven a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content in excess of the statutory maximum. The district court reversed, holding that the initial stop of the driver’s vehicle was not supported by reasonable suspicion. The court of appeals reversed the district court and held that the legality of the initial contact between the police and the driver was not relevant in the civil administrative proceeding to revoke the driver’s license. The court also held that the exclusionary rule did not apply to suppress evidence of the driver’s BAC. The supreme court holds that, under section 42-2-126, C.R.S. (2011), “probable cause” in the context of the driver’s license revocation statute, as it existed at the time of the hearing in this case, refers to the quantum and quality of evidence necessary for a law enforcement officer to issue a notice of driver’s license revocation, not whether the officer’s initial contact with the driver was lawful. The supreme court further holds that the exclusionary rule did not apply to suppress evidence of the driver’s BAC in the driver’s license revocation proceeding. Accordingly, the supreme court affirms the judgment of the court of appeals.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35(b
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35(b)
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONVERT DEFERRED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE TO UNSUPERVISED DEFERRED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONVERT DEFERRED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE TO UNSUPERVISED DEFERRED JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PERMIT ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF OUT OF STATE TRAVEL FOR EXCHANGE OF CHILDREN FOR PARENTING TIME
UNOPPOSED MOTION
TO PERMIT ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF OUT OF STATE TRAVEL FOR EXCHANGE OF CHILDREN FOR PARENTING TIME
The Court had previously granted a client on bond time to travel out of state, this motion was filed to ask court for extended time to exchange the children for parenting time.
Motion for 404B Notice
the motion requests that the Court Order the prosecution to provide notice in advance of trial that conforms to the standards set forth in People v. Spoto. Further, if the prosecution seeks to introduce such evidence, the Defendant moves that a hearing on the admissibility of such evidence be held sufficiently in advance of trial in order to afford counsel adequate time to confront the proffered evidence.
Appellant Brief on Whether an Illegal Stop Can Affect a License Revocation
Whether or not the exclusionary rule applies in driver’s license revocation proceedings, the express consent statute does not allow the Department of Revenue to revoke a driver’s license pursuant to section 42-2-126 on the basis of a search that itself is the product of an illegal stop and arrest. In this case we argued that, The court of appeals erred in holding that a driver cannot rely on the exclusionary rule to raise the illegality of initial police contact as a defense in a driver’s license revocation proceeding conducted pursuant to section Colorado Law,
Note statute has changed this since the appeal.
Entry of Appearance , Request for Discovery and Request to Reset Pretrial Conference
Firm was retained a day before the pretrial conference, we filed an entry of Appearance and Request for Discovery and Request to Reset the Pretrial Conference